[ENH] Some missing docstrings for bidsschematools

[anibalsolon]

Adding some more docstrings for the bidsschematools.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 88.65% // Head: 88.88% // Increases project coverage by +0.23% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (8eed135) compared to base (134f532).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head 8eed135 differs from pull request most recent head a7e7058. Consider uploading reports for the commit a7e7058 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1413      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.65%   88.88%   +0.23%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        1084     1080       -4     
==========================================
- Hits          961      960       -1     
+ Misses        123      120       -3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
tools/schemacode/bidsschematools/render/tables.py	87.11% <ø> (ø)
tools/schemacode/bidsschematools/render/text.py	97.47% <ø> (ø)
tools/schemacode/bidsschematools/render/utils.py	85.18% <ø> (ø)
tools/schemacode/bidsschematools/schema.py	77.90% <ø> (+2.35%)	⬆️
...ools/schemacode/bidsschematools/types/namespace.py	91.09% <ø> (ø)
tools/schemacode/bidsschematools/validator.py	96.24% <ø> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[bendhouseart]

Looks good, approval and merge should push to rtd's.

[anibalsolon]

hey @TheChymera tagging you here as well, if you'd like to take a look!

[effigies]

Above you went in the other direction.

[anibalsolon]

Ah missed this one- it should be an or. From what I saw from numpydoc that's what's used

[effigies]

Mostly good. We should pick a convention for describing types and stick with it, though.