[MISC] Add bep006 and bep010 to completed beps and fix links #186
Conversation
| | [BEP023](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yzsd1J9GT-aA0DWhdlgNr5LCu6_gvbjLyfvYq2FuxlY) | [PET Preprocessing derivatives](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yzsd1J9GT-aA0DWhdlgNr5LCu6_gvbjLyfvYq2FuxlY) | Martin Noergaard, Graham Searle, Melanie Ganz | | ||
| | [BEP024](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fqnJZ18x5LJC8jiJ8yvPHUGFzNBZ6gW2kywYrUKWtuo) | [Computed Tomography scan (CT)](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fqnJZ18x5LJC8jiJ8yvPHUGFzNBZ6gW2kywYrUKWtuo) | Hugo Boniface | | ||
| | [BEP025](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1chZv7vAPE-ebPDxMktfI9i1OkLNR2FELIfpVYsaZPr4) | [Medical Population Imaging Data structure (MIDS)](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1chZv7vAPE-ebPDxMktfI9i1OkLNR2FELIfpVYsaZPr4) | Jose Manuel Saborit Torres | | ||
| | [BEP026](https://docs.google.com/document/d/14KC1d5-Lx-7ZSMtwS7pVAAvz-2WR_uoo5FvsNirzqJw) | [Microelectrode Recordings (MER)](https://docs.google.com/document/d/14KC1d5-Lx-7ZSMtwS7pVAAvz-2WR_uoo5FvsNirzqJw) | Greydon Gilmore | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This may have some unintended conflicts with the derivatives merge due to the mismatch of this file. I don't want to add more challenges to that PR. Perhaps after that is merged this can be merged? Thank you for putting together this PR nonetheless!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I see what you mean - thanks: I wasn't aware that there are lots of changes in the derivatives PR
I guess @chrisfilo can make the call whether we should wait with this or we can go on with it, because he'd be the one who'd have to rebase the derivatives PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would not recommend any PR to wait for #109. I am syncing it with master on a regular basis and will deal with any conflicts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Given @chrisfilo's comment, could you review/approve once more @franklin-feingold ?
also: @jasmainak perhaps you could give this a quick glance. It's nothing special, but I am adding your name as a moderator of BEP021, so this is your chance to protest or approve :-)
or protestingly approve
There was a problem hiding this comment.
you know the perils of asking me to review :-) do we have renewed interest in BEP021? so far I have just been replying to people ... maybe we can look at it once the iEEG/EEG publications go through!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we do have interest in BEP021, but I also think we should gather some more experience with EEG and iEEG before moving on with 100% force ;-)
re: your review of this PR: Could you make use of the GitHub tool and approve (or disapprove)? We have community guidlines (and GH settings) here that require that as a formality.
This PR is about the two big tables about extensions (active and completed): https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/06-extensions.html
For the active ones:
For the completed ones:
Throughout, there are also some whitespace and link fixes (e.g., removing "sharing info" from a Google Doc link)