[FIX] clarify file formats in EEG, iEEG

[sappelhoff]

closes #476

@dorahermes @MaxvandenBoom this PR is primarily intended to clear up that the MEF3 format is not a .mef file, but a .mefd directory.

Do the proposed changes look good to you?

[MaxvandenBoom]

Looks correct to me!

PS. @sappelhoff if the invite was to provide for a second reviewer, it gave an error, so I couldn't accept

[dorahermes]

Thank you! I like how it clarifies the file triplet/ directory etc. and this lgtm

[sappelhoff]

Thanks both.

PS. @sappelhoff if the invite was to provide for a second reviewer, it gave an error, so I couldn't accept

yes, the invite was to:

1. properly tag you with auto completion within bids-specification
2. make your review "valid" for counting towards our branch protection rules

I sent another invitation.

[MaxvandenBoom]

Thanks both.

PS. @sappelhoff if the invite was to provide for a second reviewer, it gave an error, so I couldn't accept

yes, the invite was to:

1. properly tag you with auto completion within bids-specification
2. make your review "valid" for counting towards our branch protection rules

I sent another invitation.

This time the invitation did work, I accepted

[MaxvandenBoom]

So... should I do anything on my end to review? :)

[sappelhoff]

So... should I do anything on my end to review? :)

oh sorry --> I already took your previous answer as an "informal" review and that you approve :-)

If you want to do a formal review, click on "Files changed" in the top right, and on "Review changes" to approve, request changes, or comment.

we also have a guide on this.

[MaxvandenBoom]

So... should I do anything on my end to review? :)

oh sorry --> I already took your previous answer as an "informal" review and that you approve :-)

If you want to do a formal review, click on "Files changed" in the top right, and on "Review changes" to approve, request changes, or comment.

we also have a guide on this.

I'm new to the reviewing process over github, so thanks for the explanation :)
I "formally" approved ;)

[sappelhoff]

Thanks @MaxvandenBoom.

If you want, you could also add yourself to the list of BIDS contributors in our Wiki, which we periodically use to update the contributor list within the specification itself.

Given that you provided several fixes for the validator and performed some specification reviewing, i'd say it's high time 🙂

[MaxvandenBoom]

Thanks @MaxvandenBoom.

If you want, you could also add yourself to the list of BIDS contributors in our Wiki, which we periodically use to update the contributor list within the specification itself.

Given that you provided several fixes for the validator and performed some specification reviewing, i'd say it's high time

I would like that, thanks!! I added myself to the list :)