[ENH] Update beh/ specification to contrast with any neural recordings
#515
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
effigies
force-pushed
the
enh/generalize_behavioral
branch
from
52fb031
to
83e5f9e
Compare
|
+1 for renaming the section, but let's do line breaks and text (or everything) in #513, wdyt? |
|
If you want to cherry-pick this into #513, that's fine with me. |
sappelhoff
approved these changes
Jun 25, 2020
sappelhoff
changed the title
beh/ text to contrast with any neural recordingsbeh/ specification to contrast with any neural recordings
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reread the behavioral section in light of #513, and realized it's still written in reference to MRI and not electrophysiological or other recordings that we might end up specifying with an alternative data type directory.
Also tried to apply something like a semantic line-breaking scheme, but it wasn't 100% principled and can probably be improved if it seems important.