-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MISC] update Contributing with info on how to respond to reviews #655
[MISC] update Contributing with info on how to respond to reviews #655
Conversation
Also can I update my "emoji" in the contributors document? I never know where to squeeze in that commit... 🙈 |
you can either make that commit here, or edit this WIKI: https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/wiki/Recent-Contributors the wiki is synced with the spec once per release. |
Gotcha. 👍 And do you want me to add this ⬆️ to the |
That'd be awesome, thanks! |
Thanks @Remi-Gau, is there a way to visualize things with the pictures and the final format? Or do people read and suggest comments by reading the green text with the +? |
Ok, sorry, forget my comment, I found the button...!! It would have been nice for my past me. Getting used to GitHub :) |
Thanks @Remi-Gau!! That's super useful!! I can't see the figures, but I could very well follow the instructions. I think this document with the tips on how to navigate throw here it's really useful!! Thanks a lot :) |
Yes, agree with the new suggested order. And also if possible, I think it would be better to enumerate the sections with numbers, it really help to put order and link sequential steps. This happens to me through out all the documentation. I feel that numbers in the headings will really help to have a clear schema of things. |
OK will reorder the sections as suggested. |
I have reordered the document and tried to make sure that some sort of line length was enforced to help with any eventual future reviews. Sorry if the "diff" looks like a mess because of that. |
Dear @Remi-Gau, like @guiomar I like your new ordering (even though it was a bit hard from the current diff to read through right now, but I get the gist). So I would say this is a nice addition especially for us that have until now only used Git sporadically. :-) So thanks so much for the clarifications, @Remi-Gau! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM overall!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great! thank you @Remi-Gau !
Co-authored-by: Stefan Appelhoff <stefan.appelhoff@mailbox.org>
Maybe for another PR: add some extra links (to the turing-way book) on using github, doing code reviews... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Remi-Gau are you ready to have this PR merged? Would you first want more people to review it?
@melanieganz @guiomar are you happy? If yes, please "approve" the PR via the GitHub review tool :-)
Good with me. If I have more ideas, they can be added later. :-) |
Seems to be general agreement that this is an improvement. Let's merge and make further improvements in future PRs. |
fixes #648
This should at least give some information about how to use the Github graphic interface to accept suggestions from reviews and how to batch them.
👋 tagging @melanieganz @guiomar for extra feedback on this ( if you have time 😉 ).
For reviewers
Possible other changes to add to this PR
Would it make sense to change the order of the section in Contributing so that it maches more the "life cycle" of a PR.
Current order
Suggested order