[INFRA] dos2unix

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

I have nothing against CRLF line endings, but I am all for consistency.
This was the only text file in the whole repository with such line endings.

[effigies]

Agreed.

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

Ouch, I had forgotten the 5 days rule. Sorry about that. Since it is a very simple INFRA change, I hope this won't matter.

[sappelhoff]

Ouch, I had forgotten the 5 days rule. Sorry about that. Since it is a very simple INFRA change, I hope this won't matter.

indeed :-) good that you remembered it now. I agree though that for this simple INFRA change it's absolutely fine to merge after two maintainer approvals.

Thanks for the fix. If you find a simple way to extend our current CI to check for line endings (and error upon inconsistency), such a PR would be welcome.

[Remi-Gau]

But now it is creating a merge conflict on my "tree example" PR. 😭

Just kidding. I am sure I will survive. #Drama

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

I had a very hard time rebasing after this "dos2unix". Ended up re-creating each commit :-(

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

To fix conflicts, after git rebase master, for each conflict:

1. keep my own version of pdf_build_src/process_markdowns.py
2. dos2unix pdf_build_src/process_markdowns.py
3. git add pdf_build_src/process_markdowns.py
4. git rebase --continue

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

About line endings:

• Add a .gitattributes file to enforce line endings (grommet/grommet#3437)
• Configuring Git to handle line endings