Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] update definition acq_time for sessions.tsv #986

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 4, 2022

Conversation

Remi-Gau
Copy link
Collaborator

fixes #948

  • simplify acq_time definition by removing sections that are redundant with the Unit section
  • give different restrictions for scans.tsv and sessions.tsv

@Remi-Gau Remi-Gau requested a review from tsalo as a code owner January 23, 2022 07:56
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2022

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@d611689). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #986   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   35.13%           
=========================================
  Files             ?        8           
  Lines             ?      834           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?      293           
  Misses            ?      541           
  Partials          ?        0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d611689...03a5604. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@sappelhoff sappelhoff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! This is how I imagined it as well. 👍 Let's see what Taylor says about pulling schema description out of the schema and into the macro call.

Copy link
Member

@tsalo tsalo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure what the best way to describe this is, but I do think that the description needs to have meaningful information about the field, or else efforts like BIDS-Terms and our glossary won't be very effective. I almost think that it would be better to split the definition into multiple senses if there's no way to write a single interpretable description that only undergoes minor modifications in the tables.

WDYT of just using acc_time__sessions and acq_time__scans?

src/03-modality-agnostic-files.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/schema/objects/columns.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Remi-Gau
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Remi-Gau commented Feb 3, 2022

@tsalo I think this should be done.

Copy link
Member

@tsalo tsalo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@sappelhoff sappelhoff merged commit 32838fd into bids-standard:master Feb 4, 2022
@sappelhoff
Copy link
Member

Thanks @Remi-Gau

@Remi-Gau Remi-Gau deleted the remi-acq_time_session branch August 17, 2022 07:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

acq_time for sessions.tsv ?
3 participants