-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: rename udev rule #99
Conversation
This fixes #98. Essentially, the processing of udev rules in lexical order rendered the `TAG+="uaccess"` in the IMSProg udev rule useless. This commit fixes it by renaming the rules file, causing it to be processed before the internal handling of udev's `uacccess`.
"Collective Intelligence" concluded that the file name would be better to make |
@bigbigmdm No problem, I can adjust accordingly. Is there a changelog somewhere? This will become a breaking change, when we remove |
New version was already released without update the changelog, anyway at least release notes is complete. |
@Fantu, let me delete the release. I'll do Or is there no need to delete the release? |
@bigbigmdm Don't delete the release, don't have important issue and now the project is followed and used by many people and distro, so is better to avoid bad things. About Debian packaging:
|
@Fantu , please help to write a correct |
I suppose should start from something like:
|
@Fantu, are previous records required:
|
yes all are uploaded version (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/imsprog/news/) so must be keeped |
Thank you, @Fantu ! I'm finally starting to understand something. :) |
This was already fixed by 947320f, hence this PR is obsolete. |
@wucke13 , Yes, thank you for your help! |
This fixes #98. Essentially, the processing of udev rules in lexical order rendered the
TAG+="uaccess"
in the IMSProg udev rule useless. This commit fixes it by renaming the rules file, causing it to be processed before the internal handling of udev'suacccess
.