-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 309
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
better validation when saving paired fastqs #830
Conversation
Test PASSed. |
readNameOccurrencesMap.map({ | ||
case (numOccurrences, numReadNames) => s"${numOccurrences}x:\t$numReadNames" | ||
}).take(100).mkString("\t", "\n\t", ""), | ||
"", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: if we have more than 100 improperly paired reads, then I would think we should print an ellipsis at the end of the message.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ha yea I meant to add that and forgot, thanks, will add
Other than the small nit, LGTM! |
5230d00
to
aea329e
Compare
nit should be fixed |
Thanks @ryan-williams! I'll leave this open for comments, but if we don't hear from anyone else tomorrow, I'll merge. |
Test PASSed. |
Thanks @ryan-williams! |
logError
forLENIENT
throw
for `STRICT