Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pegas #49759

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

Pegas #49759

merged 19 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

liviurotiul
Copy link
Contributor

PR for an NGS bacteria analysis pipeline called "pegas".
This is my first attempt at an open source contribution so please be patient. :)

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 18, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new metadata file named meta.yaml has been introduced for the pegas package, version 0.2.13. This file includes essential information such as the package name, version, and source repository details, including the Git URL and SHA256 checksum for integrity verification. The build configuration specifies the build number, indicates that the package is noarch for Python, and provides a script for installation using pip. The requirements section outlines the dependencies necessary for both building and running the package, specifying compatible versions for Python and various libraries, including Plotly, Pandas, and Matplotlib. A test command is included to validate the installation by executing the package's help command. The about section contains metadata like the project's homepage, license information, a summary, and links to documentation and issue tracking. Additionally, the extra section identifies the recipe maintainer for the package.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update meta.yaml for spec2vec #49857: Updates to the meta.yaml file for the spec2vec package include changes to dependencies and build configurations, similar to those in the pegas package.
  • Add seqspec #51326: The addition of the meta.yaml file for the seqspec package involves defining package configurations, dependencies, and build processes, paralleling the changes made for pegas.

Suggested labels

please review & merge


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
recipes/pegas/meta.yaml (2)

39-48: LGTM: Comprehensive metadata provided.

The about section is well-structured and provides all necessary information. The use of GPL-2.0 license is appropriate for an open-source project.

Consider expanding the description slightly to provide more context about the specific use cases or advantages of PeGAS. For example:

  description: |
    PeGAS is a Snakemake pipeline for protein engineering and analysis. It automates the process of protein design and analysis using various bioinformatics tools. PeGAS streamlines workflows for tasks such as [specific examples of tasks], making it easier for researchers to [specific benefits or outcomes].

This expanded description would give potential users a clearer idea of how PeGAS could benefit their work.


50-52: LGTM: Maintainer information provided.

The extra section correctly lists the recipe maintainer. This is important for package management and communication.

Consider adding more maintainers if there are other contributors who are actively involved in maintaining this package. This can help ensure continued support and maintenance of the package. If appropriate, you could update the section like this:

extra:
  recipe-maintainers:
    - liviurotiul
    - other_contributor

This is optional and depends on your project's structure and contributors.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between df0f8d4 and 810a3c5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/pegas/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/pegas/meta.yaml

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
recipes/pegas/meta.yaml (2)

1-6: LGTM: Package name and version are well-defined.

The use of Jinja2 variables for the package name and version is a good practice. The version number follows semantic versioning, which is recommended for package management.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


1-2: Note: Ignore the yamllint error for Jinja2 syntax.

The static analysis tool yamllint reported a syntax error for the '%' character at the beginning of the file. This is a false positive. The '%' is part of the Jinja2 template syntax, which is valid and commonly used in Conda recipe files. You can safely ignore this warning.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

Comment on lines 8 to 10
source:
git_url: https://github.com/liviurotiul/PeGAS.git
git_branch: main
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using a specific tag or commit hash for the source.

While using the main branch works, it's generally recommended to pin the source to a specific tag or commit hash for better reproducibility. This ensures that the package is built from a known, stable version of the source code.

Consider updating the source section as follows:

source:
  git_url: https://github.com/liviurotiul/PeGAS.git
  git_rev: v{{ version }}  # Assuming tags are in the format v0.2.13

This change assumes that the repository uses tags for releases. If not, you could use a specific commit hash instead.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 810a3c5 and 4f34548.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/pegas/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/pegas/meta.yaml

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
recipes/pegas/meta.yaml (4)

1-10: LGTM! Package and source sections are well-defined.

The package name and version are correctly defined using Jinja2 variables, and the source URL properly incorporates the version tag. The inclusion of a SHA256 checksum ensures integrity verification.

Note: The yamllint error syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token can be safely ignored as it's a false positive due to the use of Jinja2 templating, which is standard in Conda recipes.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


39-49: LGTM! Comprehensive metadata provided.

The about section is well-structured and provides all necessary information, including:

  • Home URL
  • License details (GPL-2.0)
  • Summary and description of the package
  • Documentation and issue tracking links

This level of detail is excellent for users and maintainers alike.


51-53: LGTM! Maintainer information correctly provided.

The extra section properly lists the recipe maintainer, which is essential for package management and communication within the Bioconda community.


1-53: Thank you for your contribution to Bioconda!

Your meta.yaml recipe for the pegas package is well-structured and provides a good foundation. Here's a summary of the suggested improvements:

  1. Remove the unnecessary run_exports section in the build configuration.
  2. Consider relaxing version constraints in the run requirements for better compatibility.
  3. Enhance the test section with more comprehensive tests to validate package functionality.

These adjustments will help improve the recipe's flexibility and reliability. Great job on your first open-source contribution! If you have any questions about the suggested changes, please don't hesitate to ask.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

recipes/pegas/meta.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +35 to +37
test:
commands:
- {{ name }} --help
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance test coverage for better package validation.

While running the help command is a good basic test to ensure the package is installed correctly, it doesn't verify the package's functionality.

Consider adding more comprehensive tests, such as:

  1. Running a simple analysis with sample data.
  2. Importing and testing key functions or classes.
  3. Verifying the presence of important files or directories.

For example:

test:
  commands:
    - {{ name }} --help
    - {{ name }} --version
    - python -c "from pegas import some_key_function; assert some_key_function() == expected_output"
  files:
    - path/to/test/data/sample.fastq

These additional tests would provide more confidence in the package's functionality after installation. Please adjust the suggested tests according to your package's specific features and requirements.

Comment on lines 12 to 17
build:
number: 0
noarch: python
script: "{{ PYTHON }} -m pip install ."
run_exports:
- {{ pin_subpackage(name, max_pin="x") }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove unnecessary run_exports section.

The build configuration looks good overall, but as mentioned in a previous comment, the run_exports section is typically not necessary for pure Python packages. This section is more commonly used for compiled libraries to ensure ABI compatibility.

Consider removing the run_exports section:

 build:
   number: 0
   noarch: python
   script: "{{ PYTHON }} -m pip install ."
-  run_exports:
-    - {{ pin_subpackage(name, max_pin="x") }}

This simplification aligns better with typical Python package recipes in Conda-Forge and Bioconda.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
build:
number: 0
noarch: python
script: "{{ PYTHON }} -m pip install ."
run_exports:
- {{ pin_subpackage(name, max_pin="x") }}
build:
number: 0
noarch: python
script: "{{ PYTHON }} -m pip install ."

@liviurotiul
Copy link
Contributor Author

@antunderwood @pontus @brentp @ryanraaum
Hello, sorry to buzz you guys like this, this is my first conda contribution. What are the next steps I need to take to get this approved.
Thanks!


about:
home: https://github.com/liviurotiul/PeGAS
license: GPL-2.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use id from https://spdx.org/licenses/

@martin-g
Copy link
Contributor

What are the next steps I need to take to get this approved.

You just need to mark your PRs with @BiocondaBot please add label as explained at https://github.com/bioconda/bioconda-recipes/blob/master/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

@martin-g
Copy link
Contributor

@BiocondaBot please add label

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added the please review & merge set to ask for merge label Oct 19, 2024
@mencian mencian merged commit 445b837 into bioconda:master Oct 23, 2024
7 checks passed
@liviurotiul liviurotiul deleted the pegas branch October 23, 2024 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
please review & merge set to ask for merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants