Update panacus version #50987
Update panacus version #50987
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request updates the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- recipes/panacus/meta.yaml (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
recipes/panacus/meta.yaml (3)
Line range hint
1-48: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The version has been updated, the SHA256 checksum has been changed accordingly, and a new maintainer has been added. Please ensure all verification steps are completed:
- Confirm version consistency throughout the file.
- Verify the correctness of the new SHA256 checksum.
- Check that the new maintainer has appropriate permissions and understanding of the project.
Once these verifications are complete, the PR should be ready for merging.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
48-48: New maintainer added.The addition of "heringerp" as a maintainer is appropriate, as they are the contributor of this PR.
To ensure proper permissions and project understanding:
- Verify that "heringerp" has the necessary permissions on the GitHub repository.
- Confirm that "heringerp" is familiar with the Bioconda contribution guidelines.
You can use the following command to check if "heringerp" has push access to the repository:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if heringerp has push access to the repository # Note: This assumes the gh CLI is authenticated and has necessary permissions gh api repos/bioconda/bioconda-recipes/collaborators/heringerp --jq '.permissions.push // false'If the output is
true, then "heringerp" has push access. If it'sfalseor the command fails, additional steps may be needed to grant appropriate permissions.
10-10: SHA256 checksum has been updated.The SHA256 checksum has been updated, which is necessary for the new version. However, it's crucial to verify its correctness.
To ensure the integrity of the package, please verify the SHA256 checksum:
| @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ | |||
| {% set name = "panacus" %} | |||
| {% set version = "0.2.3" %} | |||
| {% set version = "0.2.4" %} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Checksum mismatch detected.
The computed checksum does not match the one specified in recipes/panacus/meta.yaml. Please verify the checksum to ensure integrity.
🔗 Analysis chain
Version update looks good.
The version has been correctly updated from 0.2.3 to 0.2.4, which aligns with the PR objective.
Let's verify that this version update is consistent throughout the file:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify version consistency in meta.yaml
# Test: Check if version 0.2.4 is used consistently
grep -n "0.2.4" recipes/panacus/meta.yaml
# Test: Ensure no occurrences of the old version remain
grep -n "0.2.3" recipes/panacus/meta.yaml
Length of output: 893
|
Is is possible to close PR #50986? This one was based on an older version of the recipe that did not include all the necessary dependencies of version 0.2.4 |
|
@BiocondaBot please add label |
Updates panacus from version 0.2.3 to 0.2.4
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.Summary by CodeRabbit
panacuspackage to version 0.2.4.