Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update gempipe to 1.35.3 #51008

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

Update gempipe to 1.35.3 #51008

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot commented Sep 27, 2024

Update gempipe: 1.35.21.35.3

install with bioconda Conda

Info Link or Description
Recipe recipes/gempipe (click to view/edit other files)
Summary gempipe is a tool for the reconstruction of strain-specific genome-scale metabolic models.
Home https://github.com/lazzarigioele/gempipe
Releases https://github.com/lazzarigioele/gempipe/tags
Recipe Maintainer(s) @lazzarigioele
Author @lazzarigioele

This pull request was automatically generated (see docs).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the gempipe package to version 1.35.3, enhancing functionality and performance.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Addressed issues by updating the source URL and SHA-256 checksum to ensure integrity and access to the latest package contents.

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added autobump Automatic Version Update new version labels Sep 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the gempipe package version from "1.35.2" to "1.35.3". It modifies the source URL to reflect the new version's tarball and updates the SHA-256 checksum to correspond with the new package contents.

Changes

File Change Summary
recipes/gempipe/meta.yaml - Version updated from "1.35.2" to "1.35.3"
- Source URL changed from v1.35.2.tar.gz to v1.35.3.tar.gz
- SHA-256 checksum updated from 4464468f342... to 98652ae059c...

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c681322 and adf0a47.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/gempipe/meta.yaml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/gempipe/meta.yaml

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
recipes/gempipe/meta.yaml (5)

1-1: Version update looks good.

The version has been correctly updated from 1.35.2 to 1.35.3, which is consistent with the PR objectives for this automated version bump.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


9-9: Source URL update is correct.

The source URL is correctly using the {{ version }} variable, which will automatically update to match the new version (1.35.3). This ensures consistency between the package version and the source tarball.


Line range hint 13-71: Unchanged parts of the recipe look good.

The build number remains at 0, which is correct for a version update. Dependencies and other metadata are unchanged, suggesting that the new version is compatible with existing requirements. This is consistent with a minor version update (1.35.2 to 1.35.3).


1-1: Ignore yamllint error for Jinja2 syntax.

The yamllint tool reports a syntax error for the '%' character at the beginning of the file. This is a false positive as the '%' is part of a Jinja2 template syntax, which is correctly used here to define the version variable. This syntax is standard and necessary in Conda recipes.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


Line range hint 1-71: Overall, the changes for this version bump look good.

The update from version 1.35.2 to 1.35.3 has been correctly implemented in the meta.yaml file. The version number, source URL, and SHA256 checksum have been updated appropriately. The rest of the recipe, including dependencies and build configurations, remains unchanged, which is expected for a minor version update.

To ensure the integrity of the package, please run the provided script to verify the SHA256 checksum of the new source tarball.

recipes/gempipe/meta.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autobump Automatic Version Update new version
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants