Update heliano meta.yaml #51243
Update heliano meta.yaml #51243
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@TobyBaril has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- recipes/heliano/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
recipes/heliano/meta.yaml (1)
14-14: LGTM: Build number increment is correct.Incrementing the build number from 0 to 1 is appropriate when making changes to the package configuration without changing its version. This follows best practices in Conda packaging.
recipes/heliano/meta.yaml
Outdated
| noarch: generic | ||
| skip: True # [linux-64 or osx-64] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the skip condition to align with PR objectives and maintain consistency.
The newly added skip condition skip: True # [linux-64 or osx-64] contradicts the PR objectives of ensuring the package is built for both linux-64 and osx-64 platforms. Additionally, it conflicts with the noarch: generic specification, which indicates that the package should be platform-independent.
To resolve these issues:
- Remove the skip condition entirely.
- Keep the
noarch: genericspecification if the package is truly platform-independent.
Here's the suggested change:
noarch: generic
- skip: True # [linux-64 or osx-64]This change will ensure that the package is built for all platforms, aligning with the PR objectives and maintaining consistency with the noarch: generic specification.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| noarch: generic | |
| skip: True # [linux-64 or osx-64] | |
| noarch: generic |
This should be platform independent, so should be built for linux-64 and osx-64
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.