Update Woltka to 0.1.7 #51263
Update Woltka to 0.1.7 #51263
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates to the Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/woltka/meta.yaml (1)
9-10: LGTM: Source URL and checksum updatesThe changes to the source section are appropriate:
- Updating to pypi.org is correct as it's the current official domain.
- The SHA256 checksum has been updated for the new version.
- Using
{{ version }}in the URL is a good practice for maintainability.Consider using
{{ name }}-{{ version }}.tar.gzinstead of hardcodingwoltkain the URL for better consistency and maintainability:url: https://pypi.org/packages/source/{{ name[0] }}/{{ name }}/{{ name }}-{{ version }}.tar.gz
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- recipes/woltka/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
recipes/woltka/meta.yaml (3)
2-2: LGTM: Version update and style improvementsThe version has been correctly updated to 0.1.7, aligning with the PR objective. The removal of quotes from the name and version fields is a valid style improvement that doesn't affect functionality.
Also applies to: 5-6
14-17: LGTM: Build section improvementsThe changes in the build section are style improvements that enhance readability without affecting functionality:
- Adjusted entry point formatting.
- Reordered noarch and script fields.
- Removed unnecessary quotes from the script command.
These changes align with best practices for YAML formatting in Conda recipes.
35-35: LGTM: Improved test sectionThe changes to the test section enhance the package verification:
- Adding
pip checkensures all dependencies are correctly specified.- Adding pip as a test requirement is necessary for the new check.
To ensure the removal of woltka.q2 and woltka.tests imports is intentional, let's verify the current package structure:
Also applies to: 37-38
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Removal of Unused Imports
The removal of
woltka.q2andwoltka.testsimports does not impact the current codebase as these directories are not present.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # List the package structure to verify submodules fd -t d . | grep -E 'woltka/(q2|tests)$'Length of output: 373
| home: https://github.com/qiyunzhu/woltka | ||
| summary: versatile meta-omic data classifier |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Re-add dev_url Field
While removing doc_url is appropriate since the Documentation URL is invalid, the Development URL remains valid. Please re-add the dev_url field to ensure developers can access necessary resources.
🔗 Analysis chain
Style improvements in about section
The changes to the home URL and summary formatting improve readability.
However, the removal of doc_url and dev_url fields might affect users looking for documentation or development resources. Let's verify if these URLs are still valid and should be included:
If these URLs are valid, consider re-adding them to provide users with easy access to documentation and development resources.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if documentation and development URLs are available
curl -sI https://github.com/qiyunzhu/woltka/wiki | grep -q "HTTP/2 200" && echo "Documentation URL is valid" || echo "Documentation URL is invalid"
curl -sI https://github.com/qiyunzhu/woltka | grep -q "HTTP/2 200" && echo "Development URL is valid" || echo "Development URL is invalid"
Length of output: 373
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Both keys had empty values in the previous version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@qiyunzhu, thank you for the clarification. Since both doc_url and dev_url fields were empty in the previous version, it's appropriate to remove them. No further action is needed.
(_/)
(•‿•)⁀ I'm glad we resolved that!
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: qiyunzhu
PR: bioconda/bioconda-recipes#51263
File: recipes/woltka/meta.yaml:41-42
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T23:41:28.630Z
Learning: In the `recipes/woltka/meta.yaml` file for the `woltka` package, the `doc_url` and `dev_url` fields were previously empty, so it's acceptable to remove them when updating the package.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
| - python >=3.6 | ||
| - hatchling |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Unnecessary Numba Dependency
The numba dependency added on line 28 is not used in the codebase.
Please remove it from the requirements in recipes/woltka/meta.yaml.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Updated dependencies
The changes to the requirements section are appropriate and align with best practices:
- Adding Python version constraints improves compatibility specification.
- Adding Hatchling and removing setuptools aligns with modern Python packaging.
- Adding Numba as a runtime dependency likely indicates performance optimizations.
To ensure the Numba dependency is necessary, let's verify its usage in the package:
Also applies to: 27-28
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Numba imports in the package
rg --type python 'import\s+numba|from\s+numba\s+import'
Length of output: 373
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Numba import statements in all Python files
rg --type python -e '^import\s+numba' -e '^from\s+numba\s+import' .
Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Numba import statements in all Python files using the correct type identifier
rg --type py -e '^import\s+numba' -e '^from\s+numba\s+import' .
Length of output: 65
There was a problem hiding this comment.
numba is indeed a dependency of this version
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@qiyunzhu, thank you for the clarification. I'll note that numba is indeed a dependency in this version.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: qiyunzhu
PR: bioconda/bioconda-recipes#51263
File: recipes/woltka/meta.yaml:23-24
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T23:37:46.238Z
Learning: In 'woltka' version 0.1.7, `numba` is a required dependency and should be included in `recipes/woltka/meta.yaml` under `requirements`.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
|
@BiocondaBot please add label |
|
LGTM, thanks @qiyunzhu! |
Update Woltka to 0.1.7
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.