-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Edited the build.sh and mata.yaml files #52085
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to two files: Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/sfold/build.sh (1)
17-19
: Consider adding error handling for the shebang updatesThe shebang updates improve script portability by using
/usr/bin/env perl
. However, consider making the script more robust.Here's a suggested improvement:
-sed -i "s:/usr/bin/perl:/usr/bin/env perl:" STarMir/*.pl -sed -i "s:/usr/bin/perl:/usr/bin/env perl:" STarMir/starmiZZer-param/*.pl -sed -i "s:/usr/bin/perl:/usr/bin/env perl:" bin/*.pl +# Update shebang lines in Perl scripts +for dir in "STarMir" "STarMir/starmiZZer-param" "bin"; do + if [ -d "$dir" ]; then + find "$dir" -name "*.pl" -type f -print0 | while IFS= read -r -d '' file; do + if head -n1 "$file" | grep -q "^#!/usr/bin/perl"; then + sed -i "1s:^#!/usr/bin/perl:#!/usr/bin/env perl:" "$file" + fi + done + fi +doneThis version:
- Checks if directories exist before processing
- Only updates files that actually have the old shebang
- Uses find to safely handle filenames with spaces
- Processes files one by one with proper error checking
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
recipes/sfold/build.sh
(1 hunks)recipes/sfold/meta.yaml
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
recipes/sfold/build.sh (1)
16-16
: LGTM: Path configuration looks correct
The SFOLDDIR path modification is properly implemented using the conda build system's PREFIX variable.
recipes/sfold/meta.yaml (1)
27-27
: Verify the necessity of r-cluster dependency.
The addition of r-cluster
as a runtime dependency should be validated against the changes in build.sh
and the package's requirements.
#!/bin/bash
# Check build.sh for R cluster usage
echo "Checking build.sh for R cluster usage:"
rg -l "cluster" recipes/sfold/build.sh || echo "No direct references found in build.sh"
# Check if any R scripts in the source use cluster package
echo -e "\nChecking source code for R cluster package usage:"
fd -e R -e r . | xargs rg -l "library.*cluster|require.*cluster" || echo "No R files found using cluster package"
Resolved conflict in meta.yaml by keeping number: 2 |
The build.sh file was edited. |
@BiocondaBot please fetch artifacts |
Package(s) built are ready for inspection:
|
Describe your pull request here
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add label
command.@bioconda/core
in a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports
(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exports
section like this:with
...
being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}
{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}
{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}
(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}
(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}
while replacing
"myrecipe"
with eithername
if aname|lower
variable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update
@BiocondaBot please add label
please review & merge
label.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifacts
You can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please merge
command is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>
and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>
.