Make TreeAdapters for Pythagorean trees more general #1651
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TreeAdapters are great and potentially useful elsewhere, too.
When implementing another adapter, I guess I found two (cosmetic) slips:
get_instances_in_nodes
accepts instances ofTreeNode
, which is specific Pythagorean trees,ROOT_PARENT
is defined as-1
, which is specific to SKL trees. A value ofNone
would be more pythonic. Besides, the code in pythagorasviewer.py compares the node with-1
instead of withROOT_PARENT
. Finally, the constant is defined in the baseTreeAdapter
as well as in the derivedSklTreeAdapter
.@pavlin-policar, can you take a look at these two cosmetic changes? Did I overlook any place that needs to be changed w.r.t this?