Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update GitHub Action Versions #371

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update GitHub Action Versions #371

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Jamie-BitFlight
Copy link
Contributor

@Jamie-BitFlight Jamie-BitFlight commented Jan 26, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

GitHub Actions Version Updates

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow configurations:
      • Upgraded actions/checkout to v4.2.2 across multiple workflows
      • Updated pozil/auto-assign-issue to v2.1.2
      • Upgraded xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher to v3.0.0
      • Updated reviewdog/action-eslint to v1.33.0
      • Upgraded davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action to v2.8.0

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 26, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on updating GitHub Actions workflow configurations across multiple files. The primary changes involve upgrading versions of various GitHub Actions used in different workflows, including actions/checkout, pozil/auto-assign-issue, xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher, reviewdog/action-eslint, and davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action. These updates aim to leverage the latest versions of these actions, potentially bringing bug fixes, improvements, and new features to the CI/CD pipeline.

Changes

File Changes
.github/workflows/assign.yml Updated pozil/auto-assign-issue from v1.13.0 to v2.1.2
.github/workflows/deploy.yml Updated actions/checkout from v4.1.1 to v4.2.2
.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml Updated actions/checkout from v4 to v4.2.2
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml - Updated actions/checkout from v4.1.1 to v4.2.2
- Updated xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher from v2 to v3.0.0
- Updated reviewdog/action-eslint from v1.20.0 to v1.33.0
.github/workflows/test.yml - Updated actions/checkout from v4.1.1 to v4.2.2
- Updated davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action from v2 to v2.8.0
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f822bc2 and 84da5ad.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/assign.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/assign.yml (1)

9-9: Verify compatibility with auto-assign-issue v2.x

The update from v1.13.0 to v2.1.2 represents a major version bump which might include breaking changes. Please verify the changelog to ensure compatibility.

✅ Verification successful

✅ Upgrade to auto-assign-issue v2.x is safe

The major version bump only changes the Node.js runtime requirement to v20, which is handled by GitHub Actions. All new features are optional and backward compatible, with no breaking changes to existing functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch release notes between v1.13.0 and v2.1.2
gh api repos/pozil/auto-assign-issue/releases --paginate | \
  jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | test("^v[12]")) | "\(.tag_name)\n\(.body)\n"'

Length of output: 3273

.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1)

14-14: LGTM! Consistent checkout action version

The update to actions/checkout@v4.2.2 aligns with the versions used in other workflows and represents a minor version bump that should maintain compatibility.

.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (2)

43-43: Verify compatibility with markdownlint-problem-matcher v3.x

The update from v2 to v3.0.0 represents a major version bump which might include breaking changes. Please verify the changelog to ensure compatibility.

✅ Verification successful

✅ markdownlint-problem-matcher v3.0.0 is safe to use

The update only includes internal maintenance changes (Node runtime update and minor dependency bump) with no breaking changes to the problem matcher functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch release notes for v3.0.0
gh api repos/xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher/releases --paginate | \
  jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name == "v3.0.0") | "\(.tag_name)\n\(.body)\n"'

Length of output: 239

47-47: Review eslint action changes from v1.20.0 to v1.33.0

The significant version jump (13 minor versions) warrants a review of the changes to ensure no regressions or unexpected behavior changes.

✅ Verification successful

Version update to action-eslint@v1.33.0 is safe to proceed

The changes between v1.20.0 and v1.33.0 are primarily maintenance updates, including reviewdog version updates and Node.js support changes. The only significant feature addition (fail_level) is optional and backward compatible.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch release notes between v1.20.0 and v1.33.0
gh api repos/reviewdog/action-eslint/releases --paginate | \
  jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | test("v1.[2-3]")) | "\(.tag_name)\n\(.body)\n"'

Length of output: 5608

.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

34-34: LGTM! Compatible version updates

Both updates maintain compatibility:

  • actions/checkout@v4.2.2 aligns with other workflows
  • vitest-coverage-report-action@v2.8.0 is a minor version update within v2.x

Also applies to: 54-54

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Statements 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Functions 76.13% 67 / 88
🔵 Branches 82.96% 190 / 229
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #121 for commit 84da5ad by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@Jamie-BitFlight