-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix link item click and navigation issues in BitNav (#9504) #9505
Fix link item click and navigation issues in BitNav (#9504) #9505
Conversation
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ast-grep (0.31.1)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Navs/Nav/_BitNavChild.razorAn unexpected error occurred while running ast-grep. src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Navs/Nav/_BitNavChild.razor.csAn unexpected error occurred while running ast-grep. WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant NavComponent
participant NavigationManager
User->>NavComponent: Click Nav Item
alt RenderLink is True
NavComponent->>NavigationManager: Yield and Navigate
else RenderLink is False
NavComponent->>NavComponent: Handle Click Directly
end
NavComponent->>NavComponent: Trigger OnItemClick Event
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Navs/Nav/_BitNavChild.razor (1)
121-121
: Consider performance impact of lambda expressionWhile the lambda expression
() => HandleOnClick(renderLink)
correctly passes the renderLink parameter, consider that lambda expressions in Blazor event handlers can impact render performance if the component frequently re-renders.Consider creating a dedicated method if this component is rendered frequently:
-OnClick="() => HandleOnClick(renderLink)" +OnClick="@HandleItemClick" +@code { + private Task HandleItemClick() => HandleOnClick(renderLink); +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Navs/Nav/_BitNavChild.razor
(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Navs/Nav/_BitNavChild.razor.cs
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Navs/Nav/_BitNavChild.razor.cs (1)
Line range hint 21-42
: Verify navigation timing behavior
The addition of Task.Yield()
to handle navigation timing is a good approach, but we should ensure it doesn't introduce any unintended side effects.
Consider these points:
- The
Task.Yield()
will only execute whenrenderLink
is true, which correctly aligns with navigation scenarios - This change might affect the perceived performance as it introduces an additional delay
- The solution addresses potential race conditions in Blazor WASM navigation
Run this script to verify the usage pattern:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Navigation timing implementation is consistent with Blazor patterns
The usage of Task.Yield()
in _BitNavChild.razor.cs
follows established patterns found across the codebase, particularly in navigation and UI update scenarios. The implementation is safe because:
- It's consistently used in other navigation-related components (e.g., Routes.razor.cs)
- The pattern is applied in similar UI state management scenarios (MainLayout.razor.cs)
- The yield is properly conditioned on
renderLink
, preventing unnecessary delays in non-navigation scenarios
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar patterns in the codebase to ensure consistent navigation handling
rg -A 3 "Task\.Yield\(\)"
# Look for potential navigation-related issues or patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'await Task.Yield()'
Length of output: 2659
closes #9504
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes