-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 649
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove verify_account_history_plugin_index() #915
Conversation
I think we need to fix it rather than removing it. Maybe add similar tests for other plugins. |
I believe this is a Protocol Impacting Issue. If so, may I request @oxarbitrage @abitmore to Label it and place it on the proper Release (remove the incorrect one, as I assigned it to both). |
not protocol update here. what happens is that the code in question is not active in the moment so i removed it. @abitmore think the code should be fixed instead of removed. I didn't had the time to take a look on how hard to fix it yet however this is something we probably can do in the next release. |
@oxarbitrage Thanks for clarifying the Release placement. May I request you add the reference to the Issue number? I am unable to locate an Issue this fixes. |
there is no issue for this, just the pull at the moment. |
maybe we should create issue for this PR ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAICS the commented-out code checks some mapping of accounts to addresses.
That doesn't make sense at all, so I don't see how this could be fixed, therefore I approve removal.
(Feel free to disagree ofc.)
I agree. The last related commit is this: a0765e2, which removed a lot of code but left some commented out. According to changes and the commit comment, the commented out code doesn't make sense any more. |
function
verify_account_history_plugin_index()
in the test cases doreturn
immediately after it is called, ignoring the body on it fully. haves no sense to keep or use IMO(maybe i am missing something), this PR remove function and calls to it.