[SM-1086] Improve TS bindings

[dani-garcia]

Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] New feature development
- [x] Tech debt (refactoring, code cleanup, dependency upgrades, etc)
- [ ] Build/deploy pipeline (DevOps)
- [ ] Other

Objective

Implement support for projects, accesstokenlogin and response unwrapping. Also added a small example

[bitwarden-bot]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – 99c45696-0e84-4df1-bbb8-7164bf3568ec

No New Or Fixed Issues Found

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@1595306). Click here to learn what that means.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #398   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   57.76%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      168           
  Lines           ?     9912           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     5726           
  Misses          ?     4186           
  Partials        ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Hinton]

This should probably go through SM review and QA process before merging. From a quick glance it looks to follow the other language bindings. @coltonhurst do we want to look into deprecating the napi bindings and swap to the wasm for gh actions?

[coltonhurst]

This should probably go through SM review and QA process before merging. From a quick glance it looks to follow the other language bindings. @coltonhurst do we want to look into deprecating the napi bindings and swap to the wasm for gh actions?

Sorry for the delayed response. Yes, I think that would be a good thing to take care of, I can create an internal ticket for this. The work deprecating the napi bindings and swapping to wasm for gh actions shouldn't block this PR though, correct?

[coltonhurst]

Looks great, only other thing I can think of is to add a readme to the languages/js directory that helps explain how to build and run the example project, kind of like we have in the other language directories. Still approved though!

(The ruby one also has a changelog file, which might be beneficial, but that could also wait until we do a release.)