Update r-test commit #9
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I think this may now be outdated. |
bjonkman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2020
bjonkman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2020
Updates to fix issues noted. Also update reg tests
bjonkman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2020
added IF NOT ALLOCATED statement in awae.f90
bjonkman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've grabbed
pullrequest/bjonkman-linearbranch frombjonkman/r-testand merged the currentmasterbranch fromopenfast/r-test. This is all now available on the OpenFAST fork. This pull request updates the r-test commit so that it gets the appropriate input file changes.You may want to verify that the r-test branch is correct after the merge. There were no conflicts, so I think everything is ok.
I've run a couple of cases locally and they passed, but lets see how it works out in GitHub Actions.