Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add OpReturnDataIsHex in build-tx-request to store hex bytes #348

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 17, 2021

Conversation

turcol
Copy link
Contributor

@turcol turcol commented Aug 4, 2021

No description provided.

@sondreb
Copy link
Member

sondreb commented Aug 4, 2021

image

@sondreb
Copy link
Member

sondreb commented Aug 17, 2021

We cannot modify the existing history API with slim method, this is a breaking change and changes what is returned. The PR also broke many tests which relies on the current API.

I have instead introduced history/slim which will return the slim version of history.

Important to note that slim will discard transactions that are sent to the self wallet.

Copy link
Member

@sondreb sondreb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can now be approved. The slim is moved into separate API, and the fee-calculation also supports hex parsing of opreturn data.

@sondreb sondreb merged commit 193e8fd into block-core:master Aug 17, 2021
sondreb added a commit to turcol/blockcore that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2021
sondreb added a commit to turcol/blockcore that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2021
sondreb added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2021
* Add OpReturnDataIsHex in build-tx-request to store hex bytes

* Update checkpoints

* Update checkpoints Rutanio

* Add missing comma at the EOL

* Remove modifications that has been added in separate PR #348

* Minor syntax change

* Remove OpenExo checkpoints that has been approved in #348

Co-authored-by: Sondre <sondre@outlook.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants