-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
httpsd memory leak in FortiOS 6.2.7 #62
Comments
For now I have configured a hourly restart of
|
From my point of view this can only be a Fortigate issue. |
I created a Fortigate-issue label for these things. |
Upgraded my -61F from 6.2.7 to 6.4.5 and disabled the workaround. Memory usage has been stable for the entire day. Suggest we create a Known Issues part of the README where we do not recommend running the exporter without adding the workaround for versions below 6.4.x WDYT @secustor ? |
Yeah, that is for sure a good idea. |
Closing this, as we have documented this now. |
@amitkatti If you feel like you have the time, submitting a case to Fortigate would be appreciated. |
I will open a ticket if we decide not to go with the upgrade. |
Just FYI - We still have the same issue with 7.0.12 - It seems to be a problem with the API access in general. That's what Fortinet submitted to our tickets at least. |
On my home Fortigate, a -61F running v6.2.7 build1190 (GA). I am entering conserve mode after ~12hr of polling at 15s intervals.
I am not observing this on v6.4.4 build1803 (GA) on a Fortigate-VM server.
I then restart
httpsd
like this:fnsysctl killall httpsd
. The result is:Log for
httpsd
in debug level -1 attached but I cannot seem to detect any odd things.httpsd.log
Given that I am not observing this leak on my Fortigate-VM instance, I am thinking this memory leak is probably one of the following:
I should be able to upgrade to 6.4.4 soon enough and give that a shot on my 61F. I might also be able to spin up a Fortigate-VM 6.2.7 and see if that has the same behavior.
I have not reported this issue to Fortinet as of yet.
Maybe interesting is that the memory usage is reported to belong to the
main
VDOM which is my traffic forwarding VDOM, not the management one (root
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: