-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
runOn__Stop - Add extra command to send on stop? #1464
Labels
Comments
gluedots
changed the title
runOn__Stop - Add extra command to send command on stop?
runOn__Stop - Add extra command to send on stop?
Feb 10, 2023
Closed
aler9
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 16, 2023
aler9
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 16, 2023
aler9
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 16, 2023
added in v1.1.0 |
This issue is being locked automatically because it has been closed for more than 6 months. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Describe the feature
Could we get a separate runOn__Stop option that will run a command on stop?
I know this can be achieved by waiting for the SIGINT signal on the regular runOn commands, but waiting for the signal requires an extra process to be running in the background just waiting there.
It would be great if we could have an extra option that could trigger a command when the SIGINT would normally be sent. This would help run some cleanup scripts when something stop.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: