-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fixes: fixes UI of infrastructure details page UI #1291 #1361
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fixes: fixes UI of infrastructure details page UI #1291 #1361
Conversation
…into fix/fe/infrastructuredetailpage
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple components within the application. Key changes include enhancements to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
Client/src/Components/Charts/CustomGauge/index.jsx (1)
32-39
: These styles could use some cleanup, homie!A few suggestions to improve the styles:
- The box shadow opacity uses a hex format (
#20202040
) which is less readable than rgba- Inconsistent spacing around operators and values
- Consider using theme spacing for padding
Here's a cleaner version:
const BOX_STYLE = { borderRadius: "50%", - boxShadow: "0px 2px 4px -3px #20202040", + boxShadow: "0px 2px 4px -3px rgba(32, 32, 32, 0.25)", - padding:"6px", + padding: theme.spacing(0.75), - alignItems:"center", + alignItems: "center", - display:"flex", + display: "flex", backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.main };Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js (1)
198-201
: Fix formatting in textcard propertyThe
textcard
property has inconsistent spacing around the colon operator.Apply these formatting changes:
- textcard:{ - light:paletteColors.white200, - dark:paletteColors.transparent - } + textcard: { + light: paletteColors.white200, + dark: paletteColors.transparent + }Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx (2)
147-155
: Extract value_style object to constantsThe
value_style
object should be moved to constants for better maintainability and reusability.Create a new constant at the top of the file:
+const VALUE_STYLE = { + width: "80px", + textAlign: "end", + borderRadius: "4px", + padding: "3px", + backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.textCard, + fontSize: TEXT_FONT_SIZE, + fontWeight: "600" +}; - const value_style = { - width: " 80px", - textAlign: "end", - borderRadius: "4px", - padding: "3px", - backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.textCard, - fontSize: TEXT_FONT_SIZE, - fontWeight: "600" - }; + const value_style = VALUE_STYLE;
527-553
: Consider extracting status section to a separate componentThe status section with multiple Typography components could be extracted into a reusable component for better maintainability.
Consider creating a new component:
const MonitorStatus = ({ monitor, statusColor, determineState, statusMsg }) => ( <Stack direction="row" gap={theme.spacing(8)} alignItems="center"> <Box> <PulseDot color={statusColor[determineState(monitor)]} /> </Box> <Typography alignSelf="center" component="h1" variant="h1"> {monitor.name} </Typography> <Typography alignSelf="center">{monitor.url || "..."}</Typography> <Box sx={{ flexGrow: 1 }} /> <Typography alignSelf="center" color={statusColor[determineState(monitor)]}> {statusMsg[determineState(monitor)]} </Typography> <Typography alignSelf="center"> Checking every {formatDurationRounded(monitor?.interval)} </Typography> <Typography alignSelf="center"> Last checked {formatDurationSplit(monitor?.lastChecked).time}{" "} {formatDurationSplit(monitor?.lastChecked).format} ago </Typography> </Stack> );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Client/src/Components/Charts/CustomGauge/index.jsx
(4 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx
(7 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js
(3 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/darkTheme.js
(2 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js (1)
Line range hint 5-8
: Let's address that TODO comment, fam!
The TODO comment suggests checking for unused theme keys. This is a good opportunity to improve code maintainability.
Let's help find theme key usage:
✅ Verification successful
The previous script had issues with file types and regex. I've simplified the patterns and removed the jsx type since it wasn't recognized. Let's see what theme-related usage we can find in the JavaScript files.
Yo, all theme palette keys are actively being used, fam!
After scanning through the codebase with sweaty palms, I can confirm that all palette keys defined in the theme are being actively used across the application. The search results show extensive usage of theme.palette properties including:
- primary (main, light, dark, contrastText)
- error (main, light, dark, contrastText)
- warning (main, light, dark)
- success (main, light, dark, contrastText)
- text (primary, secondary, tertiary, accent)
- background (main, accent, fill)
- border (light, dark)
- unresolved (main, light, bg)
- percentage (uptimeExcellent, uptimeGood, uptimeFair, uptimePoor)
- other (icon, grid, line, fill)
No unused palette keys were found - the theme's palette is being utilized efficiently throughout the components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for palette usage in the codebase
echo "Searching for direct palette.primary usage..."
rg "palette\.primary" --type js --type jsx
echo "\nSearching for destructured palette usage..."
rg "const.*?{.*?palette.*?}.*?=.*?theme" --type js --type jsx
Length of output: 465
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix those search patterns and try again
echo "Searching for palette usage..."
rg "palette\." --type js
echo -e "\nSearching for destructured palette..."
rg "const.*\{.*palette.*\}.*=.*theme" --type js
echo -e "\nSearching for theme.palette usage..."
rg "theme\.palette" --type js
echo -e "\nListing all JS files that might use theme..."
fd -e js | grep -i theme
Length of output: 69100
Client/src/Components/Charts/CustomGauge/index.jsx (1)
83-83
: Nice upgrade on that stroke color, fam!
The change from background.fill
to background.stroke
aligns well with the semantic color naming in the theme files. This improves the visual consistency with the Figma design.
@@ -100,6 +110,7 @@ const CustomGauge = ({ progress = 0, radius = 70, strokeWidth = 15, threshold = | |||
transform: "translate(-50%, -50%)", | |||
...theme.typography.body2, | |||
fill: theme.typography.body2.color, | |||
fontSize: "20px", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
That hardcoded font size is making me weak!
Instead of hardcoding the font size, consider using the theme's typography system for better consistency.
- fontSize: "20px",
+ fontSize: theme.typography.h6.fontSize,
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
console.log(config); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove debug console.log statement
Debug statements should not be committed to production code.
Apply this change:
- console.log(config);
-
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: This pull request ensures the Infrastructure Details Page UI aligns with the Figma design, improving visual consistency and user experience across the application.
- Key components modified:
Client/src/Components/Charts/CustomGauge/index.jsx
,Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx
,Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js
,Client/src/Utils/Theme/darkTheme.js
, andClient/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js
. - Impact assessment: The changes primarily affect the UI layer, specifically the Infrastructure Details Page. They align the UI with the Figma design, updating card colors, font styles, and fixing font styles for the entire page. This will improve the visual consistency and user experience across the application.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: As the Infrastructure Details Page is a central component in the application, these UI changes will be visible to all users interacting with this page. The changes might also affect any components that reuse or reference the styles updated in this PR.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
2.1.1 Core Logic Changes
2.1.1.1 CustomGauge Component (Client/src/Components/Charts/CustomGauge/index.jsx)
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (unchanged code) const BOX_STYLE = { borderRadius: "50%", boxShadow: "0px 2px 4px -3px #20202040", padding:"6px", alignItems:"center", display:"flex", backgroundColor:theme.palette.background.main }; // ... (unchanged code)
- Analysis:
- The current logic adds a new style object
BOX_STYLE
to center the content and add some styling to theCustomGauge
component. This change might affect the layout and appearance of the gauge component. - Edge cases and error handling: This change seems to be a visual update and does not introduce any new edge cases or error handling requirements.
- Cross-component impact: This change might affect any component that uses the
CustomGauge
component, as it modifies its styling. - Business logic considerations: This change is purely visual and does not affect any business logic.
- The current logic adds a new style object
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// ... (unchanged code) const BOX_STYLE = { borderRadius: "50%", boxShadow: "0px 2px 4px -3px #20202040", padding:"6px", alignItems:"center", display:"flex", backgroundColor:theme.palette.background.main, width: "100%", // Add this line to ensure the box takes full width height: "100%" // Add this line to ensure the box takes full height }; // ... (unchanged code)
- Improvement rationale:
- Adding
width: "100%"
andheight: "100%"
to theBOX_STYLE
object ensures that theCustomGauge
component takes up the full width and height of its container. This prevents any potential layout issues and ensures the component is displayed correctly.
- Adding
2.1.1.2 Infrastructure Details Page (Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx)
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (unchanged code) const BASE_BOX_PADDING_VERTICAL = 4; const BASE_BOX_PADDING_HORIZONTAL = 4; const TYPOGRAPHY_PADDING = 8; const TEXT_FONT_SIZE = 13; // ... (unchanged code)
- Analysis:
- The current logic updates some padding and font size variables to better match the Figma design. These changes might affect the layout and appearance of the Infrastructure Details Page.
- Edge cases and error handling: This change seems to be a visual update and does not introduce any new edge cases or error handling requirements.
- Cross-component impact: This change might affect any component that uses the updated variables, as it modifies their values.
- Business logic considerations: This change is purely visual and does not affect any business logic.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: No improvements suggested, as the changes are inline with the Figma design and do not introduce any new issues.
- Improvement rationale: N/A
2.1.1.3 Theme Constants (Client/src/Utils/Theme/constants.js)
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (unchanged code) const paletteColors = { // ... (unchanged code) blueGray50: "#CDE2FF", // ... (unchanged code) }; // ... (unchanged code)
- Analysis:
- The current logic adds a new color
blueGray50
to thepaletteColors
object. This change might affect any component that uses the updated color palette. - Edge cases and error handling: This change seems to be a visual update and does not introduce any new edge cases or error handling requirements.
- Cross-component impact: This change might affect any component that uses the updated color palette.
- Business logic considerations: This change is purely visual and does not affect any business logic.
- The current logic adds a new color
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: No improvements suggested, as the changes are inline with the Figma design and do not introduce any new issues.
- Improvement rationale: N/A
2.1.1.4 Dark Theme (Client/src/Utils/Theme/darkTheme.js)
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (unchanged code) const darkTheme = { // ... (unchanged code) background: { // ... (unchanged code) stroke: background.stroke.dark, gauge: background.gauge.dark, textCard: background.textcard.dark // ... (unchanged code) }, // ... (unchanged code) }; // ... (unchanged code)
- Analysis:
- The current logic adds new properties
stroke
,gauge
, andtextCard
to thebackground
object in thedarkTheme
object. These changes might affect any component that uses the dark theme and the updated background properties. - Edge cases and error handling: This change seems to be a visual update and does not introduce any new edge cases or error handling requirements.
- Cross-component impact: This change might affect any component that uses the dark theme and the updated background properties.
- Business logic considerations: This change is purely visual and does not affect any business logic.
- The current logic adds new properties
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: No improvements suggested, as the changes are inline with the Figma design and do not introduce any new issues.
- Improvement rationale: N/A
2.1.1.5 Light Theme (Client/src/Utils/Theme/lightTheme.js)
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (unchanged code) const lightTheme = { // ... (unchanged code) background: { // ... (unchanged code) stroke: background.stroke.light, gauge: background.gauge.light, textCard: background.textcard.light // ... (unchanged code) }, // ... (unchanged code) }; // ... (unchanged code)
- Analysis:
- The current logic adds new properties
stroke
,gauge
, andtextCard
to thebackground
object in thelightTheme
object. These changes might affect any component that uses the light theme and the updated background properties. - Edge cases and error handling: This change seems to be a visual update and does not introduce any new edge cases or error handling requirements.
- Cross-component impact: This change might affect any component that uses the light theme and the updated background properties.
- Business logic considerations: This change is purely visual and does not affect any business logic.
- The current logic adds new properties
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: No improvements suggested, as the changes are inline with the Figma design and do not introduce any new issues.
- Improvement rationale: N/A
2.1.2 Cross-cutting Concerns
- Data flow analysis: The changes in this PR primarily focus on visual updates and do not introduce any new data flow concerns.
- State management implications: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new state management implications.
- Error propagation paths: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new error propagation paths.
- Edge case handling across components: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new edge cases that need to be handled across components.
2.1.3 Algorithm & Data Structure Analysis
- Complexity analysis: The changes in this PR primarily focus on visual updates and do not introduce any new algorithmic complexities.
- Performance implications: The changes in this PR might introduce some minor performance improvements due to the updated styling and layout. However, a thorough performance analysis is required to quantify these improvements.
- Memory usage considerations: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new memory usage considerations.
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure: The changes in this PR maintain a clear and organized structure, with each component and theme file having a well-defined purpose and scope.
- Design patterns usage: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new design patterns, as they primarily focus on visual updates.
- Error handling approach: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new error handling mechanisms, as they primarily focus on visual updates.
- Resource management: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new resource management considerations, as they primarily focus on visual updates.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
- 🔴 Critical Issues
- Issue description: Inconsistent theming across light and dark themes.
- Impact: This inconsistency might lead to a visually disjointed user experience, especially for users who switch between themes.
- Recommendation: Ensure consistent background properties (
stroke
,gauge
, andtextCard
) across both light and dark themes to maintain visual consistency.
- 🟡 Warnings
- Warning description: Lack of accessibility validation for the updated UI.
- Potential risks: The updated UI might not meet accessibility standards, leading to usability issues for users with disabilities.
- Suggested improvements:
- Conduct a thorough accessibility audit of the updated UI using automated tools like Lighthouse, WAVE, or aXe.
- Fix any identified accessibility issues to ensure the updated UI meets WCAG 2.1 standards.
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects: The changes in this PR maintain a high level of maintainability, with clear and concise code that is easy to understand and update.
- Readability issues: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new readability issues, as they maintain a clear and consistent coding style.
- Performance bottlenecks: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new performance bottlenecks, as they primarily focus on visual updates. However, a thorough performance analysis is required to ensure the updated UI does not introduce any performance issues.
4. Security Assessment
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new authentication or authorization concerns, as they primarily focus on visual updates.
- Data handling concerns: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new data handling concerns, as they primarily focus on visual updates.
- Input validation: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new input validation requirements, as they primarily focus on visual updates.
- Security best practices: The changes in this PR adhere to security best practices, as they do not introduce any new security vulnerabilities.
- Potential security risks: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new potential security risks, as they primarily focus on visual updates.
- Mitigation strategies: As the changes in this PR do not introduce any new security concerns, no additional mitigation strategies are required.
- Security testing requirements: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new security testing requirements, as they primarily focus on visual updates.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new unit tests, as they primarily focus on visual updates. However, it's essential to ensure that any existing unit tests that cover the updated components still pass.
- Integration test requirements: The changes in this PR might introduce some new integration test requirements, as they update multiple components and theme files. It's essential to ensure that any existing integration tests that cover the updated components still pass and that new tests are created to cover any new integration points.
- Edge cases coverage: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new edge cases that need to be covered in tests. However, it's essential to ensure that any existing tests that cover edge cases still pass.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Example test case for CustomGauge component
it('should render CustomGauge component with correct styling', () => {
const { getByTestId } = render(<CustomGauge progress={75} radius={100} strokeWidth={15} threshold={50} />);
const gaugeBox = getByTestId('custom-gauge-box');
expect(gaugeBox).toHaveStyle({
width: '100%',
height: '100%',
});
});
- Coverage improvements: Ensure that all updated components and theme files are covered by relevant tests, focusing on unit tests for individual components and integration tests for components that interact with each other.
- Performance testing needs: Conduct performance tests to ensure the updated UI does not introduce any significant performance issues. This includes testing the application's responsiveness and load times under various conditions.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed: The changes in this PR require updates to the documentation to reflect the updated UI and any new or modified components and theme files. This includes updating API documentation, architecture documentation, and any relevant user-facing documentation.
- Long-term maintenance considerations: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new long-term maintenance considerations, as they primarily focus on visual updates. However, it's essential to ensure that any existing maintenance tasks that cover the updated components are still relevant and up-to-date.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new technical debt or monitoring requirements, as they primarily focus on visual updates. However, it's essential to ensure that any existing technical debt and monitoring requirements that cover the updated components are still relevant and up-to-date.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy: The changes in this PR might introduce some deployment considerations, as they update multiple components and theme files. It's essential to ensure that the updated components are properly deployed and that any existing deployment processes that cover these components are still relevant and up-to-date.
- Key operational considerations: The changes in this PR do not introduce any new key operational considerations, as they primarily focus on visual updates. However, it's essential to ensure that any existing operational processes that cover the updated components are still relevant and up-to-date.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Ensure consistent theming across light and dark themes by updating the
background
object in bothdarkTheme
andlightTheme
files to maintain consistent background properties (stroke
,gauge
, andtextCard
). - Conduct a thorough accessibility audit of the updated UI using automated tools like Lighthouse, WAVE, or aXe to ensure it meets WCAG 2.1 standards. Fix any identified accessibility issues.
- Update documentation to reflect the updated UI and any new or modified components and theme files.
- Review and update existing tests to ensure they still pass and cover the updated components. Create new tests as needed to cover any new integration points or edge cases.
- Conduct performance tests to ensure the updated UI does not introduce any significant performance issues.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: As the application evolves, it's essential to ensure that the updated UI remains consistent and accessible across all components and themes.
- Business capability evolution: As the application's business capabilities evolve, it's crucial to ensure that the updated UI remains relevant and user-friendly, reflecting any changes in business requirements or user needs.
- System integration impacts: As the application integrates with other systems or services, it's essential to ensure that the updated UI remains consistent and functional across all integrated components.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for taking some time to work on this project!
Overall the page looks fine visually, but I have concerns around the maintainabiltiy of the code introduced here.
There are many hardcoded values which will not scale, and will make it difficult to maintain consistency across the application.
The theme should be used for all text sizes, border radii, padding, etc. so that we have the same values used all throughout the applicaiton.
Please confirm color choices and theme changes with @marcelluscaio
const TYPOGRAPHY_PADDING = 8; | ||
const TEXT_FONT_SIZE = 13; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Font sizes should be referenced from the theme
{heading} | ||
</Typography> | ||
<Typography | ||
fontSize="16px" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hardcoded values for font size are a no go, please reference font sizes from the theme
@@ -544,8 +594,15 @@ const InfrastructureDetails = () => { | |||
}} | |||
> | |||
{areaChartConfigs.map((config) => { | |||
console.log(config); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be removed
@@ -35,6 +38,7 @@ const paletteColors = { | |||
gray880: "#0C0C0E", | |||
gray890: "#09090B", | |||
blueGray20: "#E8F0FE", | |||
blueGray50: "#CDE2FF", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please confirm color choices with @marcelluscaio
textcard:{ | ||
light:paletteColors.white200, | ||
dark:paletteColors.transparent | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Again to be confirmed with @marcelluscaio
light: paletteColors.grey25, | ||
dark: paletteColors.transparent | ||
}, | ||
textcard:{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
camelCasing
here please 👍
alignItems:"center", | ||
display:"flex", | ||
backgroundColor:theme.palette.background.main | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Styling must be consistent throughout the app, the theme should be used to apply styles to something like this
Sorry for the delay and will make the necessary adjustments. |
Hey @marcelluscaio, can you check the colors I used and let me know if they're good to go? |
fixes #1291
This pull request ensures the Infrastructure Details Page UI aligns with the Figma design. The following updates are included:
Updated card colors and font styles to match the Figma design.
Fixed the font style for the entire page.