457 formik and yup validations for hint fe #499
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a comprehensive refactoring of hint-related components, focusing on improved form validation and state management. The changes primarily involve integrating Formik and Yup for enhanced input handling, introducing error props, and consolidating state management across multiple components. The modifications streamline the process of creating and managing hints by implementing more robust validation and error handling mechanisms. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Form
participant Formik
participant Validation
participant OnSave
User->>Form: Enters form data
Form->>Formik: Captures input
Formik->>Validation: Validates input
alt Input is valid
Validation-->>Formik: Validation passes
Formik->>OnSave: Triggers save
else Input is invalid
Validation-->>Formik: Displays error messages
Formik->>Form: Highlights invalid fields
end
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.jsx (1)
Line range hint
23-28: Guard against unexpected inputs intargetElementvalidationYour
targetElementvalidation function assumes thatvalueis always a string (line 27). Ifvalueisundefinedor another type, this could throw an error. To keep your application steady, add a check to ensurevalueis a string before callingstartsWith.Apply this change to enhance robustness:
- (value) => { - return value.startsWith('#') || value.startsWith('.'); + (value) => { + return typeof value === 'string' && (value.startsWith('#') || value.startsWith('.')); }
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance.css (1)
25-33: Yo dawg, let's make this error styling more robust!The error styling looks decent, but there's one thing making my knees weak - the absolute positioning without a clear reference point. Consider these improvements to avoid any spaghetti situations:
.hint-appearance-error { - position: absolute; + position: absolute; + bottom: -20px; + left: 0; font-family: var(--font-family-inter); font-size: var(--font-size-sm); font-weight: 400; - line-height: 1.45; + line-height: 1.5; margin-top: 0px; color: var(--error-color); }frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.jsx (2)
87-90: Ease the burden by simplifying event handlers with Formik's state managementIn the
onChangehandlers for your input fields (lines 87-90, 119-122, 139-142, 160-162, 175-178), you're calling both your custom handler functions likehandleUrl(e)and Formik'shandleChange(e). This could lead to redundant state updates and added complexity. Since Formik effectively manages form state, consider relying solely onhandleChange(e)and utilize Formik'svaluesfor your state needs. This keeps the code light and prevents potential conflicts.Also applies to: 119-122, 139-142, 160-162, 175-178
91-94: Prevent missteps by streamlining validation inonBlurhandlersIn your
onBlurevents (lines 91-94, 123-126, 143-146, 163-166), you're invoking bothhandleBlur(e)andvalidateField('fieldName'). Formik'shandleBlur(e)already triggers validation for the field. To avoid unnecessary repetition and possible performance hits, you can trust Formik to handle validation solely withhandleBlur(e).Also applies to: 123-126, 143-146, 163-166
frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx (2)
28-41: Yo dawg, this state consolidation is fire! 🔥Consolidating the appearance states into a single object is a solid move. It's like organizing your mom's spaghetti - everything in one pot!
Consider adding TypeScript or PropTypes to make this even more robust:
const appearanceShape = { headerBackgroundColor: PropTypes.string.isRequired, headerColor: PropTypes.string.isRequired, textColor: PropTypes.string.isRequired, buttonBackgroundColor: PropTypes.string.isRequired, buttonTextColor: PropTypes.string.isRequired, };
138-141: Yo, these styles need more flex appeal! 💪Fixed width might make your UI lose itself in different screen sizes.
Consider making it more responsive:
- width: '400px', - maxWidth: '700px', - marginLeft: '2.5rem', + width: '100%', + maxWidth: '700px', + margin: '1rem auto',frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance.jsx (2)
7-13: This mapping's got the right flow, but let's level up! 🎯The label mapping is clean, but it could be more reusable.
Consider moving it to a constants file:
// src/constants/hints.js export const APPEARANCE_LABELS = { headerBackgroundColor: 'Header Background Color', // ... rest of the mappings };
50-61: The validation's got the timing of a rap battle - we need it faster! 🎵The ColorTextField integration is solid, but the validation timing could drop beats faster.
Consider enabling immediate validation:
<Formik initialValues={data} validationSchema={appearanceSchema} - validateOnMount={false} - validateOnBlur={false} + validateOnMount={true} + validateOnChange={true}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
frontend/src/components/ColorTextField/ColorTextField.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.jsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx(4 hunks)frontend/src/utils/hintHelper.js(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.css
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build (22.x)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance.css (1)
35-37: Mom's spaghetti approved! 🍝The relative positioning is on point - creating that sweet containment context for those error messages. Clean and simple, just like home cooking!
frontend/src/components/ColorTextField/ColorTextField.jsx (1)
8-8: All clear! Props to you for enhancing error handlingThe addition of the
errorprop in yourColorTextFieldcomponent is a solid move, improving validation feedback for users.frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx (2)
65-71: Clean state updates, straight outta the backend! 👊The fallback values are on point, keeping the UI consistent even when the data's weak. That's the way to handle it!
179-182: Props game strong, no cap! 💯Clean prop passing with all the necessary handlers for Formik integration. You only get one shot, do not miss your chance to blow, and you didn't!
frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.jsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance.jsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Describe your changes
Added formik to hint content and appearence.
Issue number
#457
Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review: