Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix schema validation for sticky. #853

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2018
Merged

Conversation

charginghawk
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

The wrong schema here will throw a 500 error when loading sticky with twig_debug enabled. This fixes it.

How to test

Enabled twig_debug. View a page with the sticky component. It doesn't return a 500 error.

Copy link
Contributor

@sghoweri sghoweri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still waiting on Travis to give the green light but this checks out locally when testing this out in PL. Thanks @charginghawk!

@bolt-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

⚡ PR built on Travis and deployed a now preview here:

@bolt-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

⚡ Sauce Labs Test for chrome Passed!

Image of chrome test
Test Details

@bolt-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

⚡ Sauce Labs Test for internet explorer Passed!

Image of internet explorer test
Test Details

@bolt-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

⚡ Sauce Labs Test for chrome Passed!

Image of chrome test
Test Details

@bolt-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

⚡ Sauce Labs Test for internet explorer Passed!

Image of internet explorer test
Test Details

Copy link
Collaborator

@remydenton remydenton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, obviously an oversight, thanks @charginghawk

@sghoweri sghoweri merged commit 02c2da7 into master Aug 30, 2018
@sghoweri sghoweri deleted the sticky-schema-validation branch August 30, 2018 20:02
@remydenton remydenton mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants