use latest version SDK and go

[gthao313]

Issue number:
#52

Description of changes:

• Building process uses old version SDK version, update makefile to use latest SDK verison.
• Update go version

Testing done:
Building images

1. Building a bottlerocket update operator image.

[ec2-user@ip-172-31-38-250 bottlerocket-update-operator]$ docker image ls
REPOSITORY                                             TAG                        IMAGE ID       CREATED              SIZE
update-operator-arm64                                  v0.1.4-c451ec2e            eed93f8bd863   19 seconds ago       35MB
<none>                                                 <none>                     4c52d26e902a   30 seconds ago       4.26GB
<none>                                                 <none>                     fe2681a37757   57 seconds ago       209kB

2.Push image to ECR Public, and deploy to an aarch64 bottlerocket host. and Extract logs to check if it run successfully

kubectl apply -f ./update-operator.yaml

kubectl label node $(kubectl get nodes -o jsonpath='{.items[*].metadata.name}') bottlerocket.aws/updater-interface-version=2.0.0

kubectl get nodes -o json | jq -C -S '.items | map(.metadata|{(.name): (.annotations|to_entries|map(select(.key|startswith("bottlerock
et")))|from_entries)}) | add'
{
  "ip-192-168-67-242.us-west-2.compute.internal": {
    "bottlerocket.aws/action-active": "reboot-update",
    "bottlerocket.aws/action-state": "ready",
    "bottlerocket.aws/action-wanted": "reboot-update",
    "bottlerocket.aws/update-available": "true"
  }
}

Terms of contribution:

By submitting this pull request, I agree that this contribution is dual-licensed under the terms of both the Apache License, version 2.0, and the MIT license.

[srgothi92]

Don't know anything about buildx plugin would let others review that part. I only reviewed the Go version change. Just confirming, Did you also repeated the testing after updating the Go version?

[gthao313]

Push above remove change in Changelog according to @srgothi92 comment.

[srgothi92]

Version change LGTM.

[samuelkarp]

I don't think we need this change; the SDK already has the ability to build binaries for the correct target architecture without involving buildx.

Have you run into problems using the SDK for that?

[gthao313]

Convert it to draft and will make sure if new change meets @samuelkarp 's expectation.

solution:
The arm image did run but metadata was not correct (expect arm but amd).
I was trying to use buildx as part of a multi-stage build to attach the correct metadata.

[cbgbt]

LGTM

[WilboMo]

LGTM