Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update default control container to v0.5.2 #1730

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2021

Conversation

jpculp
Copy link
Member

@jpculp jpculp commented Sep 2, 2021

Issue number:

N/A

Description of changes:

This updates the default control container from v0.5.1 to v0.5.2

Testing done:

Using a custom TUF repo, upgraded/downgraded between v1.2.0 and v1.3.0.
In AWS Systems Manager, instance showed agent upgrade/downgrade between 3.0.1209.0 and 3.1.192.0.

Terms of contribution:

By submitting this pull request, I agree that this contribution is dual-licensed under the terms of both the Apache License, version 2.0, and the MIT license.

@jpculp jpculp requested a review from tjkirch September 2, 2021 22:13
Copy link
Contributor

@tjkirch tjkirch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM pending testing.

Copy link
Contributor

@cbgbt cbgbt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same. Assuming testing looks good, :shipit:

@jpculp
Copy link
Member Author

jpculp commented Sep 13, 2021

Renamed 1.2.1 migration to 1.3.0.

I'll re-base and pull out of draft after #1742 merges.

@jpculp
Copy link
Member Author

jpculp commented Sep 13, 2021

Tested and rebased.

@jpculp jpculp marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2021 21:13
@jpculp jpculp requested a review from tjkirch September 13, 2021 21:13
@jpculp jpculp merged commit 517a274 into bottlerocket-os:develop Sep 13, 2021
@jpculp jpculp deleted the control-bump-0.5.2 branch September 13, 2021 22:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants