-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump boutdata, boututils versions #2335
Conversation
Should we prefer the pip version? |
I thought we had some fix so that Multiple test failures, all of this form:
|
We added a work-around so that if
Is that an easy thing to do? Git submodules are very convenient, but I'd assumed required using the git-repo version?
Test failures (at least
I think I'd vote for 1. What does everyone else think? |
boutproject/boutdata#46 is a fix for the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me (as long as the tests pass). I think it would be good to bump the versions in master/4.4 as well.
We're running pytest here which is now picking up the boutdata/boututils tests and failing because something's going wrong with the fixtures. This is creating a lot of output in the action logs. We should either drop pytest now, or be more specific about what we want to test (just Zoidberg I think? and even that's going to be moved out) The CMake build is also failing on
which is not terribly helpful |
The output is not captured, and is thus printed above:
I think the correct fix would be to drop |
👍 If we make the script in boutdata executable (boutproject/boutdata#47), we should be able to replace |
I don't think we want to run the I'd guess the error with the |
I'm still having issues with
And then trying to run the
|
I think I've found the cause of the error - when |
@ZedThree boutproject/boutdata#49 should fix the test failure. |
PS, I had trouble reproducing the error outside of the |
Just checked that branch, looks like it works fine, thanks @johnomotani ! Yes, I had exactly the same problem with needing to rerun the BOUT++ model to regenerate the outputs. I guess the tests in |
Yes, pretty much. The |
@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ fi | |||
if [[ ${INTEGRATED} == 1 ]] | |||
then | |||
time make check-integrated-tests | |||
time py.test-3 tools/pylib/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe keep this for zoidberg?
Or rebase #2214 to coord3d_merged2?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should also go into master/v4.4?