Upgrade from Chromium 110.0.5481.97 to Chromium 110.0.5481.100 (1.49.x)

[emerick]

Resolves brave/brave-browser#28515

Submitter Checklist:

• I confirm that no security/privacy review is needed, or that I have requested one
• There is a ticket for my issue
• Used Github auto-closing keywords in the PR description above
• Wrote a good PR/commit description
• Squashed any review feedback or "fixup" commits before merge, so that history is a record of what happened in the repo, not your PR
• Added appropriate labels (QA/Yes or QA/No; release-notes/include or release-notes/exclude; OS/...) to the associated issue
• Checked the PR locally:
  • npm run test -- brave_browser_tests, npm run test -- brave_unit_tests wiki
  • npm run lint, npm run presubmit wiki, npm run gn_check, npm run tslint
• Ran git rebase master (if needed)

Reviewer Checklist:

• A security review is not needed, or a link to one is included in the PR description
• New files have MPL-2.0 license header
• Adequate test coverage exists to prevent regressions
• Major classes, functions and non-trivial code blocks are well-commented
• Changes in component dependencies are properly reflected in gn
• Code follows the style guide
• Test plan is specified in PR before merging

After-merge Checklist:

• The associated issue milestone is set to the smallest version that the
  changes has landed on
• All relevant documentation has been updated, for instance:
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Deviations-from-Chromium-(features-we-disable-or-remove)
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Proxy-redirected-URLs
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Fingerprinting-Protections
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Brave%E2%80%99s-Use-of-Referral-Codes
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Custom-Headers
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Web-Compatibility-Exceptions-in-Brave
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/QA-Guide
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/P3A

Test Plan:

[socket-security]

Socket Security Pull Request Report

Dependency issues detected. If you merge this pull request, you will not be alerted to the instances of these issues again.

🧐 Potential typo squat

Package name is similar to other popular packages and may not be the package you want.

Use care when consuming similarly named packages and ensure that you did not intend to consume a different package. Malicious packages often publish using similar names as existing popular packages.

Package	📎 Did you mean?	Found in
eslint-plugin-licenses@1.0.2 (added)	eslint-plugin-filicensames (1.8 thousand times more downloads)	package-lock.json, package.json

Pull request report summary

Issue	Status
Install scripts	✅ 0 issues
Native code	✅ 0 issues
Bin script confusion	✅ 0 issues
Bin script shell injection	✅ 0 issues
Unresolved require	✅ 0 issues
Invalid package.json	✅ 0 issues
HTTP dependency	✅ 0 issues
Git dependency	✅ 0 issues
Potential typo squat	⚠️ 1 issue
Known Malware	✅ 0 issues
Telemetry	✅ 0 issues
Protestware/Troll package	✅ 0 issues

Bot Commands

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore foo@1.0.0 bar@2.4.2

• @SocketSecurity ignore eslint-plugin-licenses@1.0.2

Powered by socket.dev

[kjozwiak]

Uplift into 1.49.x approved 👍 As discussed via Slack, #17210 (comment) appears to be a false positive and doesn't block uplift.