Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ENS support #8125

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 6, 2021
Merged

Add ENS support #8125

merged 5 commits into from
Mar 6, 2021

Conversation

yrliou
Copy link
Member

@yrliou yrliou commented Mar 4, 2021

Resolves brave/brave-browser#14477

First two commits are just renaming things & formatting after that.
Main commit for adding ENS support is c24b31e.

Screen Shot 2021-03-04 at 2 25 30 PM

Screen Shot 2021-03-04 at 2 25 22 PM

Screen Shot 2021-03-04 at 2 26 11 PM

Submitter Checklist:

  • I confirm that no security/privacy review is needed, or that I have requested one
  • There is a ticket for my issue
  • Used Github auto-closing keywords in the PR description above
  • Wrote a good PR/commit description
  • Added appropriate labels (QA/Yes or QA/No; release-notes/include or release-notes/exclude; OS/...) to the associated issue
  • Checked the PR locally: npm run test -- brave_browser_tests, npm run test -- brave_unit_tests, npm run lint, npm run gn_check, npm run tslint
  • Ran git rebase master (if needed)

Reviewer Checklist:

  • A security review is not needed, or a link to one is included in the PR description
  • New files have MPL-2.0 license header
  • Adequate test coverage exists to prevent regressions
  • Major classes, functions and non-trivial code blocks are well-commented
  • Changes in component dependencies are properly reflected in gn
  • Code follows the style guide
  • Test plan is specified in PR before merging

After-merge Checklist:

Test Plan:

Same as #7702, just change brave.crypto to brantly.eth.

@yrliou yrliou self-assigned this Mar 4, 2021
@yrliou yrliou force-pushed the ens_support_rebase branch from 3901583 to 55a4d12 Compare March 4, 2021 20:25
@yrliou yrliou added this to the 1.23.x - Nightly milestone Mar 4, 2021
@yrliou yrliou marked this pull request as ready for review March 4, 2021 22:33
@yrliou yrliou requested review from bridiver and a team as code owners March 4, 2021 22:33
@yrliou yrliou requested a review from bbondy March 4, 2021 22:33
@yrliou yrliou force-pushed the ens_support_rebase branch from a72dfcb to 49230e2 Compare March 4, 2021 22:36
<settings-dropdown-menu id="ensResolveMethodType"
pref="{{prefs.brave.ens.resolve_method}}"
menu-options="[[ensResolveMethod_]]">
</div>
Copy link
Member

@bbondy bbondy Mar 6, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In a separate PR perhaps, but I wonder if these should go under the wallet settings. As it is now it's in the extensions settings which doesn't seem right. I know it's not really wallet, but it's along the same lines for people that care about these options. @jamesmudgett thoughts?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if (base::EndsWith(host, unstoppable_domains::kCryptoDomain)) {
*suffix_length = strlen(unstoppable_domains::kCryptoDomain) - 1;
if (base::EndsWith(host, decentralized_dns::kCryptoDomain)) {
*suffix_length = strlen(decentralized_dns::kCryptoDomain) - 1;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: I know it's not from this PR, but at some point it would be good to rename this to kUnstoppableDomain because crypto is overloaded enough already :)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Personally I felt kCryptoDomain is more straightforward for “.crypto” than kUnstoppableDomain, so I'll keep it for now.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK np here :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add ENS support
2 participants