Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MP-4766] Update no_cache docs #7504

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

archwa
Copy link
Contributor

@archwa archwa commented Jun 11, 2024

Pull Request/Issue Resolution

Description of Change:

I'm changing Connected Content no_cache docs to help customers understand that even if the no_cache option is used in Connected Content, we will still cache the response if the host is internal to Braze. This will help to avoid any possible confusion if customers wonder why Braze-to-Braze Connected Content GET requests are not being cached despite using the no_cache option.

Closes MP-4766

Is this change associated with a Braze feature/product release?

  • Yes (2024-05-21)
  • No

✔️ Pull Request Checklist
  • Check that you haven't removed any images (replacing an image with an updated one of the same name is fine), as this breaks the French site
  • Check that all links work.
  • Ensure you have completed our Contributors License Agreement.
  • Tag @josh-mccrowell-braze and @internetisaiah as a reviewer when your work is done and ready to be reviewed for merge. Are you an internal product manager? Reference the internal reviewing chart to tag the appropriate reviewer.
  • If the documentation involves a 1) paid SKU, 2) a third party, 3) SMS, 4) AI, or 5) privacy, ensure that Ana Teresa Serafino on the Legal team has signed off.
  • Tag others as reviewers as necessary.
  • If you have modified any links, be sure to add redirects to assets > js > broken_redirect_list.js
⭐ Helpful Wiki Shortcuts
❗ ATTN: For PR Reviewers
  • Read our Reviewing a PR page for more on our reviewing suggestions.
  • Read our Previewing Documentation page to see how to check the deployment.
    • Preview all changes in the linked Vercel environment by clicking the preview link in the vercel-bot comment in your PR.
❗ ATTN: Internal Reviewing Chart
Work at Braze and not sure who to tag for review?
Before tagging @josh-mccrowell-braze or @internetisaiah for a general review, reference the following chart to see if a specific product vertical/reviewer applies to your pull request.

Reviewer Product Vertical
@josh-mccrowell-braze Monolith Deployments
Quality Infrastructure
Platform Infrastructure
Datalake
SDKs
Currents
@internetisaiah Developer Guide
Technology partners
Channels
@bre-fitzgerald Intelligence
In-App Messages
Channels
Frontend Infrastructure & Experience (FIX)
@lydia-xie Ingestion
Core Objects
Core Messaging
Messaging Experience
Message Components
Email (Composition and Infrastructure) (tag @rachel-feinberg for Liquid use cases)
@rachel-feinberg Customer Lifecycle, Identity and Permissions
SMS
User Targeting
Reporting

@archwa archwa requested review from lydia-xie and a team June 11, 2024 22:47
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Jun 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@lydia-xie lydia-xie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@lydia-xie lydia-xie merged commit 953c329 into develop Jun 11, 2024
3 checks passed
@lydia-xie lydia-xie deleted the archwa/MP-4766_update-no_cache-docs branch June 11, 2024 23:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants