Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flutter uniFFI #510

Open
wants to merge 64 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Flutter uniFFI #510

wants to merge 64 commits into from

Conversation

erdemyerebasmaz
Copy link
Contributor

This is a PR to allow Flutter and Kotlin/Swift to share the binary with flutter_rust_bridge and uniFFI interfaces

@erdemyerebasmaz erdemyerebasmaz mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2024
- name: Move Source header files
working-directory: dist/ios/Sources/BreezSDKLiquid/
run: |
mv breez_sdk_liquidFFI.h ../../Classes
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is covered above now, but we should still remove the modulemap

Copy link
Contributor Author

@erdemyerebasmaz erdemyerebasmaz Sep 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it's covered above. I have removed header file artifacts under Sources.
cleanup header file artifacts

Comment on lines 65 to 66
cp -r ../build/lib/bindings/langs/swift/Sources ios/
cp -r ../build/lib/bindings/langs/swift/Sources macos/
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can remove these as we are downloading the bindings-swift artifact, which also includes the generated binding.... but... we need to add a step after the download to copy the ios/Sources to macos/Sources

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator

@dangeross dangeross left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants