Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README #107

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2014
Merged

Update README #107

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2014

Conversation

Senjai
Copy link
Contributor

@Senjai Senjai commented Feb 12, 2014

This, to me makes more sense for someone first using the gem. When ordered by descending position, new items are added to the top of the list which makes less sense than the traditional addition to the bottom of a list as is often the case in first in first out lists.

This also makes move_higher and other methods a little easier to understand when first being introduced to the gem.

This, to me makes more sense for someone first using the gem. When ordered by descending position, new items are added to the top of the list which makes less sense than the traditional addition to the bottom of a list as is often the case in first in first out lists.

This also makes move_higher and other methods a little easier to understand when first being introduced to the gem.
@swanandp
Copy link
Contributor

Sure, makes sense.

swanandp added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2014
@swanandp swanandp merged commit 332d2d7 into brendon:master Feb 12, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants