Remove internal pool #1049
Merged
Remove internal pool #1049
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
brianc
force-pushed
the
remove-internal-pool
branch
from
9ba763d
to
e469053
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a WIP pull request to pull out the internal pool object and instead use pg-pool. I want to deprecate the singleton use of
pg.connectand instead encourage (and in the future, require) folks create an instance of a pool instead of using the weird factory method that keeps a global collection of pools keyed by name. Anyways...I need to do some more work here to ensure there are no backwards incompatible changes...