Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sensor mapping insufficient #24

Open
dolfs opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Sensor mapping insufficient #24

dolfs opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
feature-request New feature or request

Comments

@dolfs
Copy link

dolfs commented Sep 19, 2022

As can be seen from the screenshot, I have a configuration that produces 8 extra sensors. Arguably 7 because #1 is missing. There might be eight easily, however, because I am using the MeteoBridge with a GW1000 from Ecowitt, which in turn supports 8 different channels for additional temp/humidity sensors (there are other types of sensors also supporting up to 8).
CleanShot 2022-09-18 at 17 48 26

The integration's code only checks for extra sensors 1-7 and thus misses my 8th sensor. A comment in another issue suggests that using MeteoBridge sensor mapping may help with this, but it is not clear how. The screenshot was produced without any custom mappings in place. At the least you might want to include documentation to describe which "logical" sensors will be picked up by the integration, so that a suitable one may be chosen.

So I'd like to understand how I can get that 8th sensor to show up, or alternatively for the integration to support 8 extra sensors (7 seems a rather odd number to have been chosen, but that's the engineer in me speaking).

@briis
Copy link
Owner

briis commented Sep 20, 2022

Hi,
Unfortunately the current Meteobridge API, has noway of letting me know how many extra sensors are setup on the system. As each sensor adds to the update time, I had to make a decision on how many I would setup - based on user input at that time, I selected 7. But I can add a sensor number 8. I will work on that as soon as I have time.

@briis briis added the feature-request New feature or request label Sep 20, 2022
@dolfs
Copy link
Author

dolfs commented Sep 20, 2022 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants