Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Firefox bans "unsafe" ports by default #1061

Closed
mmuman opened this issue Feb 14, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Firefox bans "unsafe" ports by default #1061

mmuman opened this issue Feb 14, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement suggests alteration of existing functionality to better support different use cases good first issue straightforward enough for first-time contributors to be able to implement themselves question issue where reporter seeks information about conky or a problem they encounter while running it

Comments

@mmuman
Copy link
Collaborator

mmuman commented Feb 14, 2021

Firefox started to restrict which ports it can connect to. A Firefox user trying to connect to the Conky by HTTP on the default port would get this message:

This address is restricted
This address uses a network port which is normally used for purposes other than Web browsing. Firefox has cancelled the request for your protection.

With the only option to "Try Again" which wouldn't work.

The workaround is to create a network.security.ports.banned.override key in about:config to list the ports to allow.

We should at least mention this in the documentation.

@mmuman
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mmuman commented Feb 14, 2021

Ok, I thought Firefox would filter all ports >= some arbitrary value, but it's actually a discrete list, with 10080 happening to be some antique backup software. I suppose the simplest fix would be to just use a different default port :-D

@su8
Copy link
Collaborator

su8 commented Feb 14, 2021

Can u sénd a pull réquest sir ¿

@su8 su8 added enhancement suggests alteration of existing functionality to better support different use cases good first issue straightforward enough for first-time contributors to be able to implement themselves question issue where reporter seeks information about conky or a problem they encounter while running it labels Feb 22, 2021
@respectabiggle
Copy link

it's actually a discrete list

This is great, thank you

mmuman added a commit to mmuman/conky that referenced this issue Sep 4, 2022
mmuman added a commit to mmuman/conky that referenced this issue Sep 4, 2022
This should help with brndnmtthws#1061.

Also added a warning about the default port being blocked by browsers.
mmuman added a commit to mmuman/conky that referenced this issue Sep 10, 2022
This should help with brndnmtthws#1061.

Also added a warning about the default port being blocked by browsers.
mmuman added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 11, 2022
This should help with #1061.

Also added a warning about the default port being blocked by browsers.
@Caellian
Copy link
Collaborator

This issue is resolved as the config option was added, as well as a warning about the port being blocked.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement suggests alteration of existing functionality to better support different use cases good first issue straightforward enough for first-time contributors to be able to implement themselves question issue where reporter seeks information about conky or a problem they encounter while running it
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants