Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Local reverse proxy domains & TLS w/Caddy - Issue #1039 #1066

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chaoticbear
Copy link

@chaoticbear chaoticbear commented Apr 13, 2024

Overview

Goal is to add lightweight domain routing for docker development environment configs to support dev environments closer to production network landscape with TLS & local *.lvh.me domains.

TODO

  • Add caddy reverse proxy with ims.lvh.me domain or similar
  • Add README steps for development

Tasks/Issues

@chaoticbear chaoticbear self-assigned this Apr 13, 2024
@chaoticbear chaoticbear changed the title Wa/feature/docker compose config caddy 1039 [FEATURE] Local reverse proxy domains & TLS w/Caddy - Issue #1039 Apr 13, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.69%. Comparing base (ae9150e) to head (21272fe).
Report is 114 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1066   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.69%   96.69%           
=======================================
  Files          59       59           
  Lines        1451     1453    +2     
  Branches      264      258    -6     
=======================================
+ Hits         1403     1405    +2     
  Misses         47       47           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant