-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support vtune profiling of trampolines too #3687
Merged
alexcrichton
merged 7 commits into
bytecodealliance:main
from
bnjbvr:profiling-trampolines
Jan 19, 2022
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e5ba1c0
Provide helpers for demangling function names
bnjbvr b6ddef9
Profile trampolines in vtune too
bnjbvr fd7007e
get rid of mapping
bnjbvr 1d77b37
avoid code duplication with jitdump_linux
bnjbvr 26a7c98
maintain previous default display name for wasm functions
bnjbvr 39eef6a
no dash, grrr
bnjbvr b20c414
Remove unused profiling error type
bnjbvr File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ | ||
//! Helpers for demangling function names. | ||
|
||
/// Demangles a single function name into a user-readable form. | ||
/// | ||
/// Currently supported: Rust/C/C++ function names. | ||
pub fn demangle_function_name(writer: &mut impl std::fmt::Write, name: &str) -> std::fmt::Result { | ||
if let Ok(demangled) = rustc_demangle::try_demangle(name) { | ||
write!(writer, "{}", demangled) | ||
} else if let Ok(demangled) = cpp_demangle::Symbol::new(name) { | ||
write!(writer, "{}", demangled) | ||
} else { | ||
write!(writer, "{}", name) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Demangles a function name if it's provided, or returns a unified representation based on the | ||
/// function index otherwise. | ||
pub fn demangle_function_name_or_index( | ||
writer: &mut impl std::fmt::Write, | ||
name: Option<&str>, | ||
func_id: usize, | ||
) -> std::fmt::Result { | ||
match name { | ||
Some(name) => demangle_function_name(writer, name), | ||
None => write!(writer, "<wasm-function[{}]>", func_id), | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reading over this now, there's actually a fair bit supporting this map right here, but this map is only used for an assert that each item inserted is unique. I think that may mean perhaps that we could remove this entirely? (and not worry about
MethodKind
as a new enum)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, the module id we feed ourselves and the signature index will always be different anyways, so this sanity check isn't worth the trouble.
Kept the mutex, though, because I'm unclear whether the ittapi function can be called from several threads at the same time 🤔