-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Store the ValRaw
type in little-endian format
#4035
Store the ValRaw
type in little-endian format
#4035
Conversation
This commit changes the internal representation of the `ValRaw` type to an unconditionally little-endian format instead of its current native-endian format. The documentation and various accessors here have been updated as well as the associated trampolines that read `ValRaw` to always work with little-endian values, converting to the host endianness as necessary. The motivation for this change originally comes from the implementation of the component model that I'm working on. One aspect of the component model's canonical ABI is how variants are passed to functions as immediate arguments. For example for a component model function: ``` foo: function(x: expected<i32, f64>) ``` This translates to a core wasm function: ```wasm (module (func (export "foo") (param i32 i64) ;; ... ) ) ``` The first `i32` parameter to the core wasm function is the discriminant of whether the result is an "ok" or an "err". The second `i64`, however, is the "join" operation on the `i32` and `f64` payloads. Essentially these two types are unioned into one type to get passed into the function. Currently in the implementation of the component model my plan is to construct a `*mut [ValRaw]` to pass through to WebAssembly, always invoking component exports through host trampolines. This means that the implementation for `Result<T, E>` needs to do the correct "join" operation here when encoding a particular case into the corresponding `ValRaw`. I personally found this particularly tricky to do structurally. The solution that I settled on with fitzgen was that if `ValRaw` was always stored in a little endian format then we could employ a trick where when encoding a variant we first set all the `ValRaw` slots to zero, then the associated case we have is encoding. Afterwards the `ValRaw` values are already encoded into the correct format as if they'd been "join"ed. For example if we were to encode `Ok(1i32)` then this would produce `ValRaw { i32: 1 }`, which memory-wise is equivalent to `ValRaw { i64: 1 }` if the other bytes in the `ValRaw` are guaranteed to be zero. Similarly storing `ValRaw { f64 }` is equivalent to the storage required for `ValRaw { i64 }` here in the join operation. Note, though, that this equivalence relies on everything being little-endian. Otherwise the in-memory representations of `ValRaw { i32: 1 }` and `ValRaw { i64: 1 }` are different. That motivation is what leads to this change. It's expected that this is a low-to-zero cost change in the sense that little-endian platforms will see no change and big-endian platforms are already required to efficiently byte-swap loads/stores as WebAssembly requires that. Additionally the `ValRaw` type is an esoteric niche use case primarily used for accelerating the C API right now, so it's expected that not many users will have to update for this change.
Subscribe to Label Actioncc @peterhuene
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "wasmtime:api", "wasmtime:c-api"
Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the |
@@ -119,24 +119,38 @@ typedef uint8_t wasmtime_v128[16]; | |||
*/ | |||
typedef union wasmtime_valunion { | |||
/// Field used if #wasmtime_val_t::kind is #WASMTIME_I32 | |||
/// | |||
/// Note that this field is always stored in a little-endian format. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe store char[4]
, char[8]
, ... instead? Otherwise people will likely forget to do the endianness transform. Especially as all common architectures are little endian too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer to leave this in to avoid the need for funky casts and such in C. This is not intended to be super heavily used either and other language bindings will have to deal with this anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You need funky casts either way to support big endian systems.
@@ -778,16 +778,81 @@ impl VMContext { | |||
/// This is provided for use with the `Func::new_unchecked` and | |||
/// `Func::call_unchecked` APIs. In general it's unlikely you should be using | |||
/// this from Rust, rather using APIs like `Func::wrap` and `TypedFunc::call`. | |||
/// | |||
/// This is notably an "unsafe" way to work with `Val` and it's recommended to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
*ValRaw
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment here is actually intended to point to Val
in that ValRaw
is the unsafe way of working with what is otherwise a wasm Val
value.
…asmtime_val_raw`. It seems they were mistakenly added to the `wasmtime_valunion` union whereas it is actually the `ValRaw` Rust type (represented by `wasmtime_val_raw`) that is affected by the change.
#5303) It seems they were mistakenly added to the `wasmtime_valunion` union whereas it is actually the `ValRaw` Rust type (represented by `wasmtime_val_raw`) that is affected by the change.
This commit changes the internal representation of the
ValRaw
type toan unconditionally little-endian format instead of its current
native-endian format. The documentation and various accessors here have
been updated as well as the associated trampolines that read
ValRaw
to always work with little-endian values, converting to the host
endianness as necessary.
The motivation for this change originally comes from the implementation
of the component model that I'm working on. One aspect of the component
model's canonical ABI is how variants are passed to functions as
immediate arguments. For example for a component model function:
This translates to a core wasm function:
The first
i32
parameter to the core wasm function is the discriminantof whether the result is an "ok" or an "err". The second
i64
, however,is the "join" operation on the
i32
andf64
payloads. Essentiallythese two types are unioned into one type to get passed into the function.
Currently in the implementation of the component model my plan is to
construct a
*mut [ValRaw]
to pass through to WebAssembly, alwaysinvoking component exports through host trampolines. This means that the
implementation for
Result<T, E>
needs to do the correct "join"operation here when encoding a particular case into the corresponding
ValRaw
.I personally found this particularly tricky to do structurally. The
solution that I settled on with fitzgen was that if
ValRaw
was alwaysstored in a little endian format then we could employ a trick where when
encoding a variant we first set all the
ValRaw
slots to zero, then theassociated case we have is encoding. Afterwards the
ValRaw
values arealready encoded into the correct format as if they'd been "join"ed.
For example if we were to encode
Ok(1i32)
then this would produceValRaw { i32: 1 }
, which memory-wise is equivalent toValRaw { i64: 1 }
if the other bytes in the
ValRaw
are guaranteed to be zero. Similarlystoring
ValRaw { f64 }
is equivalent to the storage required forValRaw { i64 }
here in the join operation.Note, though, that this equivalence relies on everything being
little-endian. Otherwise the in-memory representations of
ValRaw { i32: 1 }
and
ValRaw { i64: 1 }
are different.That motivation is what leads to this change. It's expected that this is
a low-to-zero cost change in the sense that little-endian platforms will
see no change and big-endian platforms are already required to
efficiently byte-swap loads/stores as WebAssembly requires that.
Additionally the
ValRaw
type is an esoteric niche use case primarilyused for accelerating the C API right now, so it's expected that not
many users will have to update for this change.