Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement a first-class error for reexported component functions #4348

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 29, 2022

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Currently I don't know how we can reasonably implement this. Given all
the signatures of how we call functions and how functions are called on
the host there's no real feasible way that I know of to hook these two
up "seamlessly". This means that a component which reexports an imported
function can't be run in Wasmtime.

One of the main reasons for this is that when calling a component
function Wasmtime wants to lower arguments first and then have them
lifted when the host is called. With a reexport though there's not
actually anything to lower into so we'd sort of need something similar
to a table on the side or maybe a linear memory and that seems like it'd
get quite complicated quite quickly for not really all that much
benefit. As-such for now this simply returns a first-class error (rather
than the current panic) in situations like this.

Currently I don't know how we can reasonably implement this. Given all
the signatures of how we call functions and how functions are called on
the host there's no real feasible way that I know of to hook these two
up "seamlessly". This means that a component which reexports an imported
function can't be run in Wasmtime.

One of the main reasons for this is that when calling a component
function Wasmtime wants to lower arguments first and then have them
lifted when the host is called. With a reexport though there's not
actually anything to lower into so we'd sort of need something similar
to a table on the side or maybe a linear memory and that seems like it'd
get quite complicated quite quickly for not really all that much
benefit. As-such for now this simply returns a first-class error (rather
than the current panic) in situations like this.
@alexcrichton alexcrichton merged commit eef1758 into bytecodealliance:main Jun 29, 2022
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the error-reexport branch June 29, 2022 14:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants