-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update wasm-tools crates to latest versions. #6394
Conversation
This included stubbing out unimplemented GC-related things and updating coredump generation to include the coredump spec changes.
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ impl Metadata { | |||
saturating_float_to_int: _, | |||
sign_extension: _, | |||
floats: _, | |||
gc: _, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mind binding this as gc
and asserting it's false down below (like memory_control
)? We'll want to turn this on eventually and we won't want to forget to add handling here.
src/commands/run.rs
Outdated
for f in bt.frames() { | ||
modulenames.insert(f.module_name().unwrap_or("<unknown>")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should the modulenames
set be deferred until the frame -> instance -> module mapping can be created? Otherwise there isn't anything pointing to the module names I think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I debated leaving that out, since it's essentially the same deal as instances. I'll remove it.
Subscribe to Label Actioncc @peterhuene
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift", "cranelift:wasm", "wasmtime:api"
Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the |
@pchickey I'll defer to you on whether we want to merge this before or after your preview-2 support branch. I'm going to leave it for now so I don't hit you with any additional rebase burden. |
This included stubbing out unimplemented GC-related things and updating coredump generation to include the coredump spec changes.
This is to unblock #6385 (comment), where @pchickey is running into some duplicate dependencies issues.