Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement most of bulk memory #976

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 26, 2020

Conversation

fitzgen
Copy link
Member

@fitzgen fitzgen commented Feb 24, 2020

Felt like a good time to start landing some of this work :)

@fitzgen fitzgen requested a review from alexcrichton February 24, 2020 23:53
crates/runtime/src/instance.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/runtime/src/instance.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/runtime/src/instance.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/runtime/src/instance.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/runtime/src/instance.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/runtime/src/libcalls.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/runtime/src/libcalls.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/runtime/src/libcalls.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/runtime/src/table.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/wast_testsuites.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fitzgen
Copy link
Member Author

fitzgen commented Feb 25, 2020

@alexcrichton I've addressed all your feedback, do you want to take another look at this?

@fitzgen fitzgen requested a review from alexcrichton February 25, 2020 21:02
@fitzgen fitzgen force-pushed the implement-most-of-bulk-memory branch 2 times, most recently from f2d9448 to 8d1b94d Compare February 25, 2020 21:27
build.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
// we need the incremental writes up to the OOB trap to be visible,
// since this is dictated by the updated spec for the bulk memory
// proposal.
if num_uncopied > 0 {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given WebAssembly/bulk-memory-operations#138 (comment) it sounds like this loop doesn't need to change much here?

@fitzgen fitzgen force-pushed the implement-most-of-bulk-memory branch 2 times, most recently from 79c94ae to 7813887 Compare February 26, 2020 21:54
@fitzgen fitzgen force-pushed the implement-most-of-bulk-memory branch from 7813887 to 66634cc Compare February 26, 2020 22:39
@fitzgen fitzgen merged commit 76e08d6 into bytecodealliance:master Feb 26, 2020
@fitzgen fitzgen deleted the implement-most-of-bulk-memory branch February 26, 2020 23:08
arkpar pushed a commit to paritytech/wasmtime that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2020
This is a breaking API change: the following settings have been renamed:

- jump_tables_enabled -> enable_jump_tables
- colocated_libcalls -> use_colocated_libcalls
- probestack_enabled -> enable_probestack
- allones_funcaddrs -> emit_all_ones_funcaddrs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants