Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Write tests for replication task processor main loop #6010

Conversation

taylanisikdemir
Copy link
Member

@taylanisikdemir taylanisikdemir commented May 10, 2024

What changed?
Added more test cases to cover replication/task_processor.go's main processing loop logic.

Why?
Improve coverage

How did you test it?

go test -timeout 60s -run ^TestTaskProcessorSuite$ github.com/uber/cadence/service/history/replication -race -v -count=3

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.72%. Comparing base (2fef3c3) to head (72fc20c).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
Files Coverage Δ
service/history/replication/task_executor.go 53.97% <ø> (ø)
service/history/replication/task_processor.go 68.70% <100.00%> (+21.98%) ⬆️

... and 12 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2fef3c3...72fc20c. Read the comment docs.

@taylanisikdemir taylanisikdemir enabled auto-merge (squash) May 10, 2024 23:53
@taylanisikdemir taylanisikdemir merged commit 957fd1a into cadence-workflow:master May 11, 2024
19 checks passed
@taylanisikdemir taylanisikdemir deleted the taylan/repl_task_proc_tests branch May 11, 2024 00:04
abhishekj720 pushed a commit to abhishekj720/cadence that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
timl3136 pushed a commit to timl3136/cadence that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants