Disentangle El Dorado and Placer County in the NTD Monthly Ridership Report #1260
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related task: #1261
Related epic: #1027
El Dorado County Transportation Commission
andPlacer County Transportation Planning Agency
inquired us asking where is the "published data" Caltrans is required to deliver to RTPAs, via sb125. as of 10/17, the monthly ntd ridership site did not have a separate tab for these RTPAs. Further investigation shows that though these RTPAs did not have separate tabs, the associated transit operators were showing under the SACOG tab. (City of Placer, El Dorado County Transit Authority)Updated the
ntd_id_rtpa_crosswalk
to have City of Roseville and County of Placer under the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency RTPA. and El Dorado County Transit Authority under the El Dorado County Transportation Commission RTPA.Made minor updates to the
deploy_portfolio_yaml.py
script to read in the updated crosswalk.Re-parameterize the notebooks and was able to deploy to netlify with no errors. Also confirm new notebooks were parameterized, and new tabs were created for El Dorado and Placer County.