Consider vintage availability in cost calculations #20
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| equations: | ||
| - expression: > | ||
| $annualisation_weight * ( | ||
| $depreciation_rate * ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similarly, could you explain where annualisation_weight and depreciation_rate are set?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking at the expression, it seems we are close to TEMOA's approach, which I think is good...
But honestly it's a tad hard to be sure on my part...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
irm-codebase
approved these changes
Oct 25, 2024
|
I thought I had approved this a while ago, turns out I did not! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current implementation is summing
flow_cap_newacrossvintagestepsno matter what investment period you're in. So, in 2030 it is the sum of new capacity costs in 2020, 2030, 2040, and 2050! It should just be 2020 and 2030, or not even 2020 if the technology lifetime < 10 years.