-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
i.e., a.m., p.m., e.g., et cetera #43
Comments
Also consider |
Honestly I think BTW is more like a compound word, and doesn't need a delay. Nor do USA, pm, C.E.O or M.I.T. When I say "more like a compound word." I mean that while it etymologically is composed of several words, anyone who knows "BTW" is probably able to parse its meaning without actually deconstructing it, just like you don't mentally split |
Indeed — my point was that |
@MalcolmMcC For native English speakers, that might be the case. But for those others, like me, that read articles in English on a regular basis, it still isn't obvious to deconstruct things such as |
Fair point @GizMogwai. Maybe have that as a setting? Even better, a setting that lets those be turned into their component parts, so it would read |
+1 to the expansion-option. Though we'd need to be careful that abbreviations for one thing don't get expanded to another (mediocre example: 'WTF' is an obscure family of genes). I suppose that'd be the use-case for the option in Settings. |
The other issue with this is that sometimes the abbreviations take on Malcolm McCulloch On 13 March 2014 16:04, Jordan notifications@github.com wrote:
|
Also related: numbers and money. |
Just came on here because I got the same think with |
"it still isn't obvious to deconstruct things such as YMMV" Splitting the letters up one by one doesn't help you understand the meaning. A dictionary does, just like a word you haven't seen before. In my opinion, your issue is more similar to any user that hits a word they don't know or odd grammar and need time to work out what it means. |
Agree with @porcoesphino. You can't understand acronyms or initialisms any better when presented letter by letter. If anything, it's worse, because it requires additional cognitive processing the recall the entire string and assign it context. When placed together, they eventually become as recognizable as regular words, once the reader knows them. |
I think there should be a general solution to this, that for something to be concidered a new sentence it should contain more than four/five characters, if it doesn't it should be concidered a single word. This would take care of a lot of abbriavations and other things, in all languages. |
fyi possible oartial resolution in thread auto-reffed above. |
Initialisms, when separated by "." are threaded as separate words, which make them harder to understand (e.g.:
e.g.
becomese.
g.
;-) ).Another use case are Initialisms that are not separated with dots but written all uppercase (e.g.:
BTW
). Those are also harder to understand as they represent multiple words and you have to transcode them first.Proposal: identify both patterns, display them as a single word, but increase the delay before the next word shows up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: