Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test latest CKF in an airgapped environment #681

Open
kimwnasptd opened this issue Aug 28, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Test latest CKF in an airgapped environment #681

kimwnasptd opened this issue Aug 28, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
docs Something is missing or incorrect in the CKF docs. This may be implicitly concluded from the issue

Comments

@kimwnasptd
Copy link
Contributor

We need to test the current CKF in an airgapped environment to gather list of issues that block it's deployment.

In the past we've worked on 3 areas for this:

  1. Automate testing CKF in an airgapped environment #678
  2. Ensure our Charms don't do apt install in their code feat: Remove apt-install from Dex Charm dex-auth-operator#148
  3. Extend our Charms to be able to configure all the images the charmed container might deploy

The last piece is to know do a pass and test the latest/edge bundle in an airgapped environment and gather list of issues we will find.

@kimwnasptd
Copy link
Contributor Author

Until #679 is resolved though we'll need to manually find the list of images, to use when deploying the bundle

@kimwnasptd
Copy link
Contributor Author

We'll also need to pay extra care to

As exposed in #680 (comment), since they use an operator to handle the installation.

For those two, if we are time pressured, we can still document a workaround on getting them to work on airgapped by updating the manifests after the installation.

@phoevos phoevos added the docs Something is missing or incorrect in the CKF docs. This may be implicitly concluded from the issue label Aug 30, 2023
@i-chvets
Copy link
Contributor

i-chvets commented Aug 31, 2023

Istio configurable images implementation is tracked here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Something is missing or incorrect in the CKF docs. This may be implicitly concluded from the issue
Projects
Status: Labeled
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants