Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add integration tests for auth-proxy, forward-auth relations and app scaling #62

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 23, 2024
Merged

Add integration tests for auth-proxy, forward-auth relations and app scaling #62

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

natalian98
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds tests cases for:

  • adding and removing auth-proxy and forward-auth relations provided by oathkeeper
  • scaling oathkeeper up and down while integrated with the above
  • identity and access proxy (401/200 responses, response headers)

@natalian98 natalian98 marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2024 16:56
@natalian98 natalian98 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 21, 2024 16:56
wood-push-melon
wood-push-melon reviewed Feb 21, 2024
View reviewed changes
src/config_map.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
wood-push-melon
wood-push-melon approved these changes Feb 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@wood-push-melon wood-push-melon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@natalian98 natalian98 merged commit 10ceff5 into main Feb 23, 2024
3 checks passed
@natalian98 natalian98 deleted the IAM-664-add-integration-tests branch February 23, 2024 16:06
@natalian98
Copy link
Contributor Author

closes #52

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@wood-push-melon wood-push-melon wood-push-melon approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@natalian98 @wood-push-melon